Professor JON MCKECHNIE Jon.Mckechnie@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY
Environmental and financial implications of ethanol as a bioethylene feedstock versus as a transportation fuel
McKechnie, Jon; Pourbafrani, Mohammad; Saville, Bradley A.; MacLean, Heather L.
Authors
Mohammad Pourbafrani
Bradley A. Saville
Heather L. MacLean
Abstract
Bulk chemicals production from biomass may compete with biofuels for low-cost and sustainable biomass sources. Understanding how alternative uses of biomass compare in terms of financial and environmental parameters is therefore necessary to help ensure that efficient uses of resources are encouraged by policy and undertaken by industry. In this paper, we compare the environmental and financial performance of using ethanol as a feedstock for bioethylene production or as a transport fuel in the US life cycle-based models are developed to isolate the relative impacts of these two ethanol uses and generate results that are applicable irrespective of ethanol production pathway. Ethanol use as a feedstock for bioethylene production or as a transport fuel leads to comparable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fossil energy consumption reductions relative to their counterparts produced from fossil sources. By displacing gasoline use in vehicles, use of ethanol as a transport fuel is six times more effective in reducing petroleum energy use on a life cycle basis. In contrast, bioethylene predominately avoids consumption of natural gas. Considering 2013 US ethanol and ethylene market prices, our analysis shows that bioethylene is financially viable only if significant price premiums are realized over conventional ethylene, from 35% to 65% depending on the scale of bioethylene production considered (80 000 t yr−1 to 240 000 t yr−1). Ethanol use as a transportation fuel is therefore the preferred pathway considering financial,GHGemissions, and petroleum energy use metrics, although bioethylene production could have strategic value if demand-side limitations of ethanol transport fuel markets are reached.
Citation
McKechnie, J., Pourbafrani, M., Saville, B. A., & MacLean, H. L. (2015). Environmental and financial implications of ethanol as a bioethylene feedstock versus as a transportation fuel. Environmental Research Letters, 10(12), https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124018
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 28, 2015 |
Publication Date | Dec 16, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Jun 6, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 6, 2016 |
Journal | Environmental Research Letters |
Electronic ISSN | 1748-9326 |
Publisher | IOP Publishing |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Issue | 12 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124018 |
Keywords | ethanol; ethylene; bulk chemicals from biomass; life cycle asssessment |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/769268 |
Publisher URL | http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124018/meta;jsessionid=7CD6C4DD87467543EE74CD06F7FA2A5C.c1.iopscience.cld.iop.org |
Contract Date | Jun 6, 2016 |
Files
erl_10_12_124018.pdf
(957 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search