C.R. Thorne
Overcoming uncertainty and barriers to adoption of Blue-Green Infrastructure for urban flood risk management: Uncertainties and barriers to adoption of BGI
Thorne, C.R.; Lawson, E.C.; Ozawa, C.; Hamlin, S.L.; Smith, L.A.
Authors
Dr EMILY O'DONNELL Emily.O'donnell@nottingham.ac.uk
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
C. Ozawa
S.L. Hamlin
L.A. Smith
Abstract
Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) and Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) are increasingly recognised as vital components of urban flood risk management. However, uncertainty regarding their hydrologic performance and lack of confidence concerning their public acceptability create concerns and challenges that limit their widespread adoption. This paper investigates barriers to implementation of BGI in Portland, Oregon, using the Relevant Dominant Uncertainty (RDU) approach. Two types of RDU are identified: scientific RDU’s related to physical processes that affect infrastructure performance and service provision, and socio-political RDU’s that reflect a lack of confidence in socio-political structures and public preferences for BGI. We find that socio-political RDU’s currently exert the strongest negative influences on BGI decision making in Portland. We conclude that identification and management of both biophysical and socio-political uncertainties are essential to broadening the implementation of BGI and sustainable urban flood risk management solutions that are practical, scientifically sound, and supported by local stakeholders.
Citation
Thorne, C., Lawson, E., Ozawa, C., Hamlin, S., & Smith, L. (2018). Overcoming uncertainty and barriers to adoption of Blue-Green Infrastructure for urban flood risk management: Uncertainties and barriers to adoption of BGI. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, S960-S972. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12218
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 7, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 6, 2015 |
Publication Date | 2018-02 |
Deposit Date | Apr 30, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 30, 2016 |
Journal | Journal of Flood Risk Management |
Electronic ISSN | 1753-318X |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
Pages | S960-S972 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12218 |
Keywords | Best management practices; Blue-Green cities; confidence; sustainable drainage systems; urban flood risk management; uncertainty |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/767389 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12218 |
Contract Date | Apr 30, 2016 |
Files
Thorne_et_al-2015-Journal_of_Flood_Risk_Management.pdf
(812 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
You might also like
Managing flood risk in Blue-Green Cities
(2024)
Book Chapter
Sponge City Program (SCP) and Urban Flood Management (UFM)—The Case of Guiyang, SW China
(2021)
Journal Article
Delivering multiple co-benefits in blue-green cities
(2021)
Report
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search