Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases

Bailey, Stephen H.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to consider the case law on the requirement of standing to bring judicial review proceedings to challenge decisions made in the context of public procurement. There are suggestions in this case law that the approach to standing in such cases is narrower than that normally adopted in judicial review proceedings. It is the contention of this article that such suggestions should be firmly resisted.

Citation

Bailey, S. H. (2015). Reflections on standing for judicial review in procurement cases. Public Procurement Law Review, 24(4),

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: May 5, 2015
• Publication Date: Dec 1, 2015
• Deposit Date: Jul 8, 2016
• Publicly Available Date: Jul 8, 2016
• Journal: Public Procurement Law Review
• Print ISSN: 0963-8245
• Electronic ISSN: 0963-8245
• Publisher: Sweet and Maxwell
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 24
• Issue: 4
• Keywords: Judicial Review; Standing; Public Procurement
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/764771
• Related Public URLs: http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=419&productid=6928
• Additional Information: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Public Procurement Law Review following peer review. The definitive published version at [2015] 4 P.P.L.R 122- 132 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.
• Contract Date: Jul 8, 2016