Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The frequency and nature of prescribing problems by GPs-in-training (REVISiT): a retrospective review

Salema, Nde Eshimuni; Bell, Brian; Marsden, Kate; Gookey, Gill; Swanwick, Glen; Bassi, Mindy; Mehta, Rajnikant; Silcock, Nick; Avery, Anthony J.; Knox, Richard

The frequency and nature of prescribing problems by GPs-in-training (REVISiT): a retrospective review Thumbnail


Authors

Nde Eshimuni Salema

BRIAN BELL BRIAN.BELL@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Research Fellow

Kate Marsden

Gill Gookey

Glen Swanwick

Mindy Bassi

Rajnikant Mehta

Nick Silcock

Richard Knox



Abstract

Background: Prescribing errors can cause significant morbidity and occur in about 5% of prescriptions in English general practices. Aim: To describe the frequency and nature of prescribing problems in a cohort of GPs-in-training to determine whether they need additional prescribing support. Design & setting: A primary care pharmacist undertook a retrospective review of prescriptions issued between 9 October 2014 and 11 March 2015 by 10 GPs in their final year of training from 10 practices in England. Method: Pre-existing standards and expert panel discussion were used to classify the appropriateness of prescribing. Data were imported into Stata (version 13) to perform descriptive analysis. An individualised report highlighting prescribing errors, suboptimal prescribing, and areas of good practice identified during the review was shared with the GPs-in-training and their trainers. This report was used to guide discussions during the GP-in-training’s feedback session. Results: A total of 1028 prescription items were reviewed from 643 consultations performed by 10 GPs-in-training. There were 92 prescribing errors (8.9%) and 360 episodes of suboptimal prescribing (35.0%). The most common types of error concerned medication dosages (n = 30, 32.6% of errors). Conclusion: Personalised review of prescribing revealed an error rate higher than recorded in a previous similar study mainly comprising GPs who had completed postgraduate training, and a substantially higher rate of suboptimal prescribing. A larger intervention study is now required to evaluate the effectiveness of receiving a personalised review of prescribing, and to assess its impact on patient safety.

Citation

Salema, N. E., Bell, B., Marsden, K., Gookey, G., Swanwick, G., Bassi, M., …Knox, R. (2022). The frequency and nature of prescribing problems by GPs-in-training (REVISiT): a retrospective review. BJGP Open, 6(3), Article BJGPO.2021.0231. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0231

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 8, 2022
Online Publication Date Aug 9, 2022
Publication Date Sep 1, 2022
Deposit Date Mar 22, 2022
Publicly Available Date Aug 17, 2022
Journal BJGP Open
Electronic ISSN 2398-3795
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 6
Issue 3
Article Number BJGPO.2021.0231
DOI https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0231
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7644956
Publisher URL https://bjgpopen.org/content/early/2022/08/08/BJGPO.2021.0231

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations