MARNIE BRENNAN MARNIE.BRENNAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor
Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians
Brennan, M. L.; Dean, R. S.; Nielsen, T. D.; Dean, Rachel S.; Massey, A.; Brennan, Marnie L.
Authors
R. S. Dean
T. D. Nielsen
Rachel S. Dean
A. Massey
Marnie L. Brennan
Abstract
Access to the most up-to-date evidence is an important cornerstone for veterinarians attempting to practice in an evidence-based manner; therefore, an understanding of what and how information is accessed is vital. The aim of this study was to identify what resources the UK veterinary profession access and regard as most useful. Based on questionnaires received from veterinarians, the Veterinary Times was nominated as most often read journal or magazine by respondents (n=3572, 79 per cent). In Practice (n=3224, 82 per cent) and the Veterinary Record (n=165, 34 per cent) were seen as most useful by clinicians, and non-clinicians, respectively. Google was the most often nominated electronic resource by all respondents (n=3076, 71 per cent), with Google (n=459, 23 per cent) and PubMed (n=60, 17 per cent) seen as most useful by clinicians and non-clinicians, respectively. The abstract and conclusion sections were the most read parts of scientific manuscripts nominated by all respondents. When looking for assistance with difficult cases, colleagues were the common information choice for clinicians. Different sections of the veterinary profession access information, and deem resources useful, in different ways. Access to good quality evidence is important for the practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine, and therefore, researchers should think about disseminating their findings in a targeted way for optimal use by the profession.
Citation
Brennan, M. L., Dean, R. S., Nielsen, T. D., Dean, R. S., Massey, A., & Brennan, M. L. (2015). Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians. Veterinary Record, 177(7), 172-172. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.103068
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 15, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 5, 2015 |
Publication Date | Aug 15, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Dec 12, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 12, 2016 |
Journal | Veterinary Record |
Print ISSN | 0042-4900 |
Electronic ISSN | 2042-7670 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 177 |
Issue | 7 |
Article Number | 172 |
Pages | 172-172 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.103068 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/758870 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.103068 |
Contract Date | Dec 12, 2016 |
Files
Vet survey 2 172.full.pdf
(1.1 Mb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
You might also like
Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England
(2008)
Journal Article
Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in North-West England
(2012)
Journal Article
Cattle producers’ perceptions of biosecurity
(2013)
Journal Article
Clinical audit in veterinary practice: theory v reality
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search