Stephanie J. Hanley
Managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: a UK survey of healthcare professionals and parents
Hanley, Stephanie J.; Walker, Kate F.; Wakefield, Natalie; Plachcinski, Rachel; Pallotti, Phoebe; Tempest, Nicola; Pillai, Arani; Thornton, Jim; Jones, Nia; Mitchell, Eleanor J.
Authors
KATE WALKER Kate.Walker@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Professor
Natalie Wakefield
Rachel Plachcinski
Phoebe Pallotti
Nicola Tempest
Arani Pillai
Jim Thornton
Nia Jones
ELEANOR MITCHELL ELEANOR.MITCHELL@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Associate Professor
Abstract
Objective(s)
To understand current practice, expertise and training requirements for management of an impacted fetal head (IFH) at caesarean section (CS) in the UK, and whether a clinical trial of techniques to manage an IFH is acceptable.
Study design
Five hundred and thirty-eight online surveys were completed by obstetricians (n = 206), obstetric anaesthetists (n = 38), midwives (n = 35) and parents (n = 259). Data was collected on incidences of CS and IFH, current use of techniques, and acceptability of a clinical trial to manage an IFH from health care professionals. Information on incidences of CS and recollection of an IFH, acceptability of techniques, and likelihood of taking part in a clinical trial were sought from parents.
Results
The most common technique used by obstetricians (84%) and midwives (69%) was the ‘push technique’. Eighty-seven percent of health care professionals would be willing to participate in a clinical trial, with 89% confirming that results would guide their clinical practice. Most parents expressed reluctance regarding participation in a clinical trial during labour (62%), due to preferring a doctor to adopt the technique they felt most comfortable with (63%).
Conclusion(s)
Given the lack of national guidance on appropriate techniques, no formal training, and no consensus on best practice for the management of an IFH during emergency CS, it is perhaps not surprising that the majority of heath care professionals would be willing to participate in a clinical trial, where results will guide their clinical practice. The future development of clinical trials, involving relevant stakeholders in the design of such trials, is crucial to improve upon the guidance and training provided to staff who may encounter an IFH.
Citation
Hanley, S. J., Walker, K. F., Wakefield, N., Plachcinski, R., Pallotti, P., Tempest, N., …Mitchell, E. J. (2022). Managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: a UK survey of healthcare professionals and parents. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 271, 88-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.01.033
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 21, 2022 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 7, 2022 |
Publication Date | Apr 1, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Feb 15, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 23, 2022 |
Journal | European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology |
Print ISSN | 0301-2115 |
Electronic ISSN | 1872-7654 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 271 |
Pages | 88-92 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.01.033 |
Keywords | Obstetrics and Gynecology; Reproductive Medicine |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7467972 |
Publisher URL | https://www.ejog.org/article/S0301-2115(22)00046-X/fulltext |
Files
Managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: a UK survey of healthcare professionals and parents
(394 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom
(2015)
Journal Article
Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older
(2016)
Journal Article
Labour induction near term for women aged 35 or over: an economic evaluation
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search