Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Inconsistency indices in pairwise comparisons: an improvement of the Consistency Index

Sato, Yuji; Tan, Kim Hua

Inconsistency indices in pairwise comparisons: an improvement of the Consistency Index Thumbnail


Authors

Yuji Sato

KIM TAN kim.tan@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Operations and Innovation Management



Abstract

The Consistency Index and the Consistency Ratio of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) were designed to measure the ratio of inconsistent judgments among pairwise comparisons (PCs), which have been the principal indices for the past four decades. Definitions of inconsistency measures for PCs have yet to be established, however, because of the difficulty in quantifying subjectivity in judgments. Therefore, an empirical review that can take such subjective factors into account is essential. In this paper, the Consistency Ratio is thus reviewed using subjective data, and then a new inconsistency index for PCs is proposed based on the review. The review is based on subjective data obtained from two opinion surveys, which focuses on the relationship between the Consistency Ratio and two indicators: (1) the conformity of the results of the AHP and that of the ranking method, and (2) the goodness-of-fit of weight elicited by the AHP to human perception. A new inconsistency index is then proposed based on the mathematical property of a pairwise comparison matrix and further validated based on the conformity and the goodness-of-fit of weight. The results show that the proposed index detects inconsistency among real-world PCs more sensitively than could the Consistency Ratio; the index might suggest the reliability of the output of a pairwise comparison matrix.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 10, 2021
Online Publication Date Jan 25, 2022
Publication Date Jan 25, 2022
Deposit Date Feb 11, 2022
Publicly Available Date Jan 26, 2023
Journal Annals of Operations Research
Print ISSN 0254-5330
Electronic ISSN 1572-9338
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04431-3
Keywords Decision support systems・Pairwise comparison・Inconsistency・Human perception
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7416259
Publisher URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-021-04431-3

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations