Research Repository

See what's under the surface

Spending by primary care practices-does it show what we expect?

James, Marilyn; Stokes, Elizabeth


Marilyn James

Elizabeth Stokes


Over recent years, a number of policies and financial incentives in primary care have been proposed to tackle issues such as deprivation and health outcomes. This article investigates the association between healthcare spending, deprivation and outcomes. It argues that individual practice data are analysed before blanket application and acceptance that one size fits all in a local area.

Financial data were analysed alongside key outcome data, including quality and outcomes framework (QOF) indicators for a large urban primary care trust (PCT) in the UK. The PCT had a large population and number of practices, including single-handed practices and an average list size in excess of 5000. The PCT will remain anonymous.

There was no relationship between primary care investment and the practices' deprivation score. There was a strong statistically significant negative correlation between QOF payments and deprivation, (correlation = −0.46, p 

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Aug 4, 2014
Journal International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Print ISSN 0749-6753
Electronic ISSN 1099-1751
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 29
Issue 3
Institution Citation James, M., & Stokes, E. (2014). Spending by primary care practices-does it show what we expect?. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 29(3), doi:10.1002/hpm.2224
Keywords primary care policy; investment; outcome; QOF indicators; deprivation
Publisher URL
Copyright Statement Copyright information regarding this work can be found at the following address:


James_et_al-2014-The_International_Journal_of_Health_Planning_and_Management.pdf (206 Kb)

VoR - Version of Record

Downloadable Citations