Kay Bridger
Patients views on which return-to-work outcomes should be prioritised: A nominal group technique focus group
Bridger, Kay; Kellezi, Blerina; Kendrick, Denise; Kettlewell, Jade; Holmes, Jain; Timmons, Stephen; Andrews, Isabel; Fallon, Stephen; Radford, Kate
Authors
Blerina Kellezi
Professor DENISE KENDRICK DENISE.KENDRICK@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH
Dr JADE KETTLEWELL Jade.Kettlewell@nottingham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Dr JAIN HOLMES JAIN.HOLMES@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
SENIOR RESEARCH FELLOW
Professor STEPHEN TIMMONS stephen.timmons@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT
Isabel Andrews
Stephen Fallon
Professor Kate Radford K.Radford@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH
Abstract
Objective: Injuries can have a long-lasting effect on ability to return to work, but there is little research on which outcomes are most important to patients. This study aims to identify and prioritise return-to-work outcomes important to patients for evaluating vocational rehabilitation interventions. Methods: Nominal group technique focus group with trauma patients. Results: Focus group participants (n = 6) included mostly traumatic brain injuries, a range of occupation types, ages and both genders. Participants identified and prioritised their eight most important outcomes which were: sense of purpose and life satisfaction, understanding the impact of injury, assessment of readiness to return to work, using SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound) goals, facilitated reintegration to work, assessing capacity to return to work, collaboration between key stakeholders and improved employer and employee knowledge. Many of these were measures of the process of, rather than change outcomes of vocational rehabilitation. Conclusions: The range of outcomes identified by trauma patients highlights the complex process of return to work and the need for vocational rehabilitation evaluations to incorporate a broader range of outcomes. Measures of the process of vocational rehabilitation are also important to trauma patients and should be included in such evaluations.
Citation
Bridger, K., Kellezi, B., Kendrick, D., Kettlewell, J., Holmes, J., Timmons, S., Andrews, I., Fallon, S., & Radford, K. (2022). Patients views on which return-to-work outcomes should be prioritised: A nominal group technique focus group. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 85(9), 704-711. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226211072766
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 15, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 2, 2022 |
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2022 |
Deposit Date | Jan 4, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 2, 2022 |
Journal | British Journal of Occupational Therapy |
Print ISSN | 0308-0226 |
Electronic ISSN | 1477-6006 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 85 |
Issue | 9 |
Pages | 704-711 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226211072766 |
Keywords | injuries, patient outcomes, vocational rehabilitation |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7164128 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/03080226211072766 |
Files
Patients views on which return-to-work outcomes should be prioritised: A nominal group technique focus group
(585 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search