Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evidence around early induction of labor in women of advanced maternal age and those using assisted reproductive technology

Venkatanarayanan, Nandini; Walker, Kate F.

Evidence around early induction of labor in women of advanced maternal age and those using assisted reproductive technology Thumbnail


Authors

Nandini Venkatanarayanan

KATE WALKER Kate.Walker@nottingham.ac.uk
Clinical Professor



Abstract

Worldwide, there has been a trend toward later motherhood. Concurrently, the incidence of subfertility has been on the rise, necessitating conception using assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). These pregnancies are considered high risk due to fetal complications such as antepartum stillbirth and growth restriction and maternal complications such as increase in maternal morbidity and mortality. Early induction of labor can help to mitigate these risks. However, this has to be balanced against the iatrogenic harms of earlier delivery to both the baby, including respiratory distress and NICU stay, and the mother who might experience longer labor and other complications such as uterine hyperstimulation. Induction of labor at 39 weeks is the optimal timing for preventing antepartum stillbirth and avoiding iatrogenic harm. Delivery by elective cesarean section is not advocated as its benefits in these patients are unclear compared with the short- and long-term complications of a major abdominal surgery.

Citation

Venkatanarayanan, N., & Walker, K. F. (2021). Evidence around early induction of labor in women of advanced maternal age and those using assisted reproductive technology. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 77, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.007

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 19, 2021
Online Publication Date Sep 15, 2021
Publication Date Nov 1, 2021
Deposit Date Dec 22, 2021
Publicly Available Date Sep 16, 2022
Journal Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Print ISSN 1521-6934
Electronic ISSN 1532-1932
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 77
Pages 42-52
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.007
Keywords Obstetrics and Gynecology; General Medicine
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7056419
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521693421001218?via%3Dihub

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations