Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cattle farmer psychosocial profiles and their association with control strategies for bovine viral diarrhea

Prosser, N. S.; Green, M. J.; Ferguson, E.; Tildesley, M. J.; Hill, E. M.; Keeling, M. J.; Kaler, J.

Cattle farmer psychosocial profiles and their association with control strategies for bovine viral diarrhea Thumbnail


Authors

M. J. Green

EAMONN FERGUSON eamonn.ferguson@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Health Psychology

M. J. Tildesley

E. M. Hill

M. J. Keeling

JASMEET KALER JASMEET.KALER@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Epidemiology & Precision Livestock Informatics



Abstract

Bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) is endemic in the United Kingdom and causes major economic losses. Control is largely voluntary for individual farmers and is likely to be influenced by psychosocial factors, such as altruism, trust, and psychological proximity (feeling close) to relevant “others,” such as farmers, veterinarians, the government, and their cows. These psychosocial factors (factors with both psychological and social aspects) are important determinants of how people make decisions related to their own health, many of which have not been studied in the context of infectious disease control by farmers. Farmer psychosocial profiles were investigated using multiple validated measures in an observational survey of 475 UK cattle farmers using the capability, opportunity, motivation-behavior (COM-B) framework. Farmers were clustered by their BVD control practices using latent class analysis. Farmers were split into 5 BVD control behavior classes, which were tested for associations with the psychosocial and COM-B factors using multinomial logistic regression, with doing nothing as the baseline class. Farmers who were controlling disease both for themselves and others were more likely to do something to control BVD (e.g., test, vaccinate). Farmers who did not trust other farmers, had high psychological capability (knowledge and understanding of how to control disease), and had high physical opportunity (time and money to control disease) were more likely to have a closed, separate herd and test. Farmers who did not trust other farmers were also more likely to undertake many prevention strategies with an open herd. Farmers with high automatic motivation (habits and emotions) and reflective motivation (decisions and goals) were more likely to vaccinate and test, alone or in combination with other controls. Farmers with high psychological proximity (feeling of closeness) to their veterinarian were more likely to undertake many prevention strategies in an open herd. Farmers with high psychological proximity to dairy farmers and low psychological proximity to beef farmers were more likely to keep their herd closed and separate and test or vaccinate and test. Farmers who had a lot of trust in other farmers and invested in them, rather than keeping everything for themselves, were more likely to be careful introducing new stock and test. In conclusion, farmer psychosocial factors were associated with strategies for BVD control in UK cattle farmers. Psychological proximity to veterinarians was a novel factor associated with proactive BVD control and was more important than the more extensively investigated trust. These findings highlight the importance of a close veterinarian-farmer relationship and are important for promoting effective BVD control by farmers, which has implications for successful nationwide BVD control and eradication schemes.

Citation

Prosser, N. S., Green, M. J., Ferguson, E., Tildesley, M. J., Hill, E. M., Keeling, M. J., & Kaler, J. (2022). Cattle farmer psychosocial profiles and their association with control strategies for bovine viral diarrhea. Journal of Dairy Science, 105(4), 3559-3573. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21386

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 5, 2021
Online Publication Date Jan 27, 2022
Publication Date Apr 1, 2022
Deposit Date Dec 15, 2021
Publicly Available Date Jan 27, 2022
Journal Journal of Dairy Science
Print ISSN 0022-0302
Electronic ISSN 1525-3198
Publisher American Dairy Science Association
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 105
Issue 4
Pages 3559-3573
DOI https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21386
Keywords Genetics; Animal Science and Zoology; Food Science
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/7019092
Publisher URL https://www.journalofdairyscience.org/article/S0022-0302(22)00053-4/fulltext
Related Public URLs https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030222000534

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations