Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Disclosure of information under competition: An experimental study

Sheth, Jesal D.

Disclosure of information under competition: An experimental study Thumbnail


Authors

Jesal D. Sheth



Abstract

The theory of voluntary disclosure of information posits that market forces lead firms (senders) to disclose information through a process of unravelling. This prediction requires that consumers (receivers) hold correct beliefs and, in equilibrium, make adverse inferences about non-disclosed information. Previous research finds that receivers are naïve and do not sufficiently infer non-disclosure as bad news, leading to the failure of complete unravelling. This paper experimentally examines whether competition between senders increases unravelling and decreases receivers' naivety about non-disclosed information. We find that while complete unravelling fails to occur, competition between senders significantly increases unravelling and receivers' overall welfare. Receivers' welfare increases despite no significant difference in their guesses or beliefs about non-disclosed information relative to the treatment without competition, and this is driven by higher rates of disclosure by senders. We conclude that competition between senders positively affects disclosure of information and receivers' welfare.

Citation

Sheth, J. D. (2021). Disclosure of information under competition: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 129, 158-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2021.05.009

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 25, 2021
Online Publication Date Jun 2, 2021
Publication Date Sep 1, 2021
Deposit Date Nov 17, 2021
Publicly Available Date Jun 3, 2023
Journal Games and Economic Behavior
Print ISSN 0899-8256
Electronic ISSN 1090-2473
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 129
Pages 158-180
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2021.05.009
Keywords Economics and Econometrics; Finance; Competition; Experiment; Disclosure; Verifiable information; Conflict of interest
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/6727964
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089982562100066X

Files





Downloadable Citations