Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 3 – trials conducted using administrative databases do not adequately report elements related to use of databases

Langan, Sinéad M.; Imran, Mahrukh; Mc Cord, Kimberly; McCall, Stephen J.; Kwakkenbos, Linda; Sampson, Margaret; Fröbert, Ole; Gale, Chris; Hemkens, Lars G.; Langan, Sinéad M; Moher, David; Relton, Clare; Zwarenstein, Merrick; Juszczak, Edmund; Thombs, Brett D.

Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 3 – trials conducted using administrative databases do not adequately report elements related to use of databases Thumbnail


Authors

Sinéad M. Langan

Mahrukh Imran

Kimberly Mc Cord

Stephen J. McCall

Linda Kwakkenbos

Margaret Sampson

Ole Fröbert

Chris Gale

Lars G. Hemkens

Sinéad M Langan

David Moher

Clare Relton

Merrick Zwarenstein

Brett D. Thombs



Abstract

Objective: We evaluated reporting completeness and transparency in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted using administrative data based on 2021 CONSORT Extension for Trials Conducted Using Cohorts and Routinely Collected Data (CONSORT-ROUTINE) criteria. Study Design and Setting: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Methodology Register were searched (2011 and 2018). Eligible RCTs used administrative databases for identifying eligible participants or collecting outcomes. We evaluated reporting based on CONSORT-ROUTINE, which modified eight items from CONSORT 2010 and added five new items. Results: Of 33 included trials (76% used administrative databases for outcomes, 3% for identifying participants, 21% both), most were conducted in the United States (55%), Canada (18%), or the United Kingdom (12%). Of eight items modified in the extension; six were adequately reported in a majority (>50%) of trials. For the CONSORT-ROUTINE modification portion of those items, three items were reported adequately in >50% of trials, two in <50%, two only applied to some trials, and one only had wording modifications and was not evaluated. For five new items, four that address use of routine data in trials were reported inadequately in most trials. Conclusion: How administrative data are used in trials is often sub-optimally reported. CONSORT-ROUTINE uptake may improve reporting.

Citation

Langan, S. M., Imran, M., Mc Cord, K., McCall, S. J., Kwakkenbos, L., Sampson, M., Fröbert, O., Gale, C., Hemkens, L. G., Langan, S. M., Moher, D., Relton, C., Zwarenstein, M., Juszczak, E., & Thombs, B. D. (2022). Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 3 – trials conducted using administrative databases do not adequately report elements related to use of databases. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 141, 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.010

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 7, 2021
Online Publication Date Sep 11, 2021
Publication Date Jan 1, 2022
Deposit Date Oct 27, 2021
Publicly Available Date Oct 27, 2021
Journal Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Print ISSN 0895-4356
Electronic ISSN 1878-5921
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 141
Pages 187-197
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.010
Keywords Epidemiology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/6540249
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435621002900
Additional Information Authors on behalf of CONSORT Extension for Trials Conducted Using Cohorts and Routinely Collected Data Group.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations