JADE KETTLEWELL Jade.Kettlewell@nottingham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor
Factors Affecting the Delivery and Acceptability of the ROWTATE Telehealth Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention for Traumatic Injury Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Study
Kettlewell, Jade; Lindley, Rebecca; Radford, Kate; Patel, Priya; Bridger, Kay; Kellezi, Blerina; Timmons, Stephen; Andrews, Isabel; Fallon, Stephen; Lannin, Natasha; Holmes, Jain; Kendrick, Denise
Authors
REBECCA LINDLEY REBECCA.LINDLEY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Research Assistant
Dr KATHRYN RADFORD Kate.Radford@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Rehabilitation Research
PRIYA PATEL Priya.Patel1@nottingham.ac.uk
Research Assistant
Kay Bridger
Blerina Kellezi
STEPHEN TIMMONS stephen.timmons@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Health Services Management
Isabel Andrews
Stephen Fallon
Natasha Lannin
JAIN HOLMES JAIN.HOLMES@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Senior Research Fellow
DENISE KENDRICK DENISE.KENDRICK@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Primary Care Research
Abstract
Background: Returning to work after traumatic injury can be problematic. We developed a vocational telerehabilitation (VR) intervention for trauma survivors, delivered by trained occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs), and explored factors affecting delivery and acceptability in a feasibility study. Methods: Surveys pre-(5 OTs, 2 CPs) and post-training (3 OTs, 1 CP); interviews pre-(5 OTs, 2 CPs) and post-intervention (4 trauma survivors, 4 OTs, 2 CPs). Mean survey scores for 14 theoretical domains identified telerehabilitation barriers (score ≤ 3.5) and facilitators (score ≥ 5). Interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed. Results: Surveys: pre-training, the only barrier was therapists’ intentions to use telerehabilitation (mean = 3.40 ± 0.23), post-training, 13/14 domains were facilitators. Interviews: barriers/facilitators included environmental context/resources (e.g., technology, patient engagement, privacy/disruptions, travel and access); beliefs about capabilities (e.g., building rapport, complex assessments, knowledge/confidence, third-party feedback and communication style); optimism (e.g., impossible assessments, novel working methods, perceived importance and patient/therapist reluctance) and social/professional role/identity (e.g., therapeutic methods). Training and experience of intervention delivery addressed some barriers and increased facilitators. The intervention was acceptable to trauma survivors and therapists. Conclusion: Despite training and experience in intervention delivery, some barriers remained. Providing some face-to-face delivery where necessary may address certain barriers, but strategies are required to address other barriers.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 14, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 16, 2021 |
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Sep 14, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 22, 2021 |
Journal | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Print ISSN | 1661-7827 |
Electronic ISSN | 1660-4601 |
Publisher | MDPI AG |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 18 |
Issue | 18 |
Article Number | 9744 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189744 |
Keywords | Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/6239275 |
Publisher URL | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9744 |
Additional Information | Authors on behalf of the ROWTATE Team |
Files
Factors Affecting the Delivery and Acceptability of the ROWTATE Telehealth Vocational Rehabilitation Intervention for Traumatic Injury Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Study
(1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search