Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study

Mulla, Ebrahim; Orton, Elizabeth; Kendrick, Denise

Abstract

Background In England, GPs are independent contractors working to a national contract. Since 2017, the contract requires GPs to use electronic tools to proactively identify moderate and severe frailty in people aged ≥65 years, and offer interventions to help those identified to stay well and maintain independent living. Little is currently known about GPs' views of this contractual requirement. Aim To explore GPs' views of identifying frailty and offering interventions for those living with moderate or severe frailty. Design and setting A sequential mixed-methods study of GPs in the East Midlands region of England - namely Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, and Northamptonshire - undertaken between January and May 2019. Method GPs were made aware of the study via professional organisations' newsletters and bulletins, GP email lists, and social media, and were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and, based on those survey responses, GPs with a range of GP and practice characteristics, as well as views on identifying frailty, were selected to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interview transcripts were analysed using framework analysis. Results In total, 188 out of 3058 (6.1%) GPs responded to the survey and 18 GPs were interviewed. GPs were broadly supportive of identifying frailty, but felt risk-stratification tools lacked sensitivity and specificity, and wanted evidence showing clinical benefit. Frailty identification increased workload and was under-resourced, with limited time for, and access to, necessary interventions. GPs felt they lacked knowledge about frailty and more education was required to better understand it. Conclusion Proactively identifying and responding to frailty in primary care requires GP education, highly sensitive and specific risk-stratification tools, better access to interventions to lessen the impact of frailty, and adequate resourcing to achieve potential clinical impact.

Citation

Mulla, E., Orton, E., & Kendrick, D. (2021). Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study. British Journal of General Practice, 71(709), e604-e613. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0178

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Feb 22, 2021
• Online Publication Date: Jun 29, 2021
• Publication Date: 2021-08
• Deposit Date: Jun 29, 2021
• Publicly Available Date: Jun 29, 2021
• Journal: British Journal of General Practice
• Print ISSN: 0960-1643
• Electronic ISSN: 1478-5242
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 71
• Issue: 709
• Pages: e604-e613
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0178
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5746783
• Publisher URL: https://bjgp.org/content/71/709/e604