Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Surgery Plus Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Primary Endocrine Therapy Alone in UK Women Aged 70 and Over With Early Breast Cancer

Holmes, Geoffrey R.; Ward, Sue E.; Brennan, Alan; Bradburn, Michael; Morgan, Jenna L.; Reed, Malcolm W.R.; Richards, Paul; Rafia, Rachid; Wyld, Lynda; Burton, Maria; Lifford, Kate; Edwards, Adrian; Walters, Stephen; Ring, Alistair; Robinson, Thompson; Martin, Charlene; Chater, Tim; Pemberton, Kirsty; Cheung, Kwok Leung; Todd, Annaliza; Brain, Kate; Audisio, Riccardo A.; Wright, Juliette; Simcock, Richard; Thomson, Alistair; Gosney, Margot; Hatton, Matthew; Green, Tracy; Revill, Deirdre; Gath, Jacqui

Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Surgery Plus Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Primary Endocrine Therapy Alone in UK Women Aged 70 and Over With Early Breast Cancer Thumbnail


Authors

Geoffrey R. Holmes

Sue E. Ward

Alan Brennan

Michael Bradburn

Jenna L. Morgan

Malcolm W.R. Reed

Paul Richards

Rachid Rafia

Lynda Wyld

Maria Burton

Kate Lifford

Adrian Edwards

Stephen Walters

Alistair Ring

Thompson Robinson

Charlene Martin

Tim Chater

Kirsty Pemberton

Annaliza Todd

Kate Brain

Riccardo A. Audisio

Juliette Wright

Richard Simcock

Alistair Thomson

Margot Gosney

Matthew Hatton

Tracy Green

Deirdre Revill

Jacqui Gath



Abstract

Objectives: Approximately 20% of UK women aged 70+ with early breast cancer receive primary endocrine therapy (PET) instead of surgery. PET reduces surgical morbidity but with some survival decrement. To complement and utilize a treatment dependent prognostic model, we investigated the cost-effectiveness of surgery plus adjuvant therapies versus PET for women with varying health and fitness, identifying subgroups for which each treatment is cost-effective. Methods: Survival outcomes from a statistical model, and published data on recurrence, were combined with data from a large, multicenter, prospective cohort study of over 3400 UK women aged 70+ with early breast cancer and median 52-month follow-up, to populate a probabilistic economic model. This model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of surgery plus adjuvant therapies relative to PET for 24 illustrative subgroups: Age {70, 80, 90} × Nodal status {FALSE (F), TRUE (T)} × Comorbidity score {0, 1, 2, 3+}. Results: For a 70-year-old with no lymph node involvement and no comorbidities (70, F, 0), surgery plus adjuvant therapies was cheaper and more effective than PET. For other subgroups, surgery plus adjuvant therapies was more effective but more expensive. Surgery plus adjuvant therapies was not cost-effective for 4 of the 24 subgroups: (90, F, 2), (90, F, 3), (90, T, 2), (90, T, 3). Conclusion: From a UK perspective, surgery plus adjuvant therapies is clinically effective and cost-effective for most women aged 70+ with early breast cancer. Cost-effectiveness reduces with age and comorbidities, and for women over 90 with multiple comorbidities, there is little cost benefit and a negative impact on quality of life.

Citation

Holmes, G. R., Ward, S. E., Brennan, A., Bradburn, M., Morgan, J. L., Reed, M. W., Richards, P., Rafia, R., Wyld, L., Burton, M., Lifford, K., Edwards, A., Walters, S., Ring, A., Robinson, T., Martin, C., Chater, T., Pemberton, K., Cheung, K. L., Todd, A., …Gath, J. (2021). Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Surgery Plus Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Primary Endocrine Therapy Alone in UK Women Aged 70 and Over With Early Breast Cancer. Value in Health, 24(6), 770-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.016

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 2, 2020
Online Publication Date Apr 15, 2021
Publication Date 2021-06
Deposit Date Jun 25, 2021
Publicly Available Date Apr 16, 2022
Journal Value in Health
Print ISSN 1098-3015
Electronic ISSN 1524-4733
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Issue 6
Pages 770-779
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.016
Keywords Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Health Policy
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5723407
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301521000966#!
Additional Information Authors and the Age Gap Trial Steering Group.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations