Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Irreconcilable differences: Divorcing ethics from existential authenticity

Rickly, Jillian M.; Vidon, Elizabeth S.; Knudsen, Daniel C.

Irreconcilable differences: Divorcing ethics from existential authenticity Thumbnail


Authors

Elizabeth S. Vidon

Daniel C. Knudsen



Abstract

This paper challenges tourism research that attempts to bring together existential authenticity and ethics. Following on from others who have revived philosophically driven investigations of authenticity, we turn to key existential thinkers to specifically assess the ethical deficit of existential phenomenology. Doing so reveals Simone de Beauvoir to be unique in her development of an existential ethics. However, this does not fully allow us to reconcile existential authenticity with ethics in the existing tourism literature, as existential philosophy tells us that unethical actions can be authentic and ethical actions can be in inauthentic. Identifying these irreconcilable differences, we argue that future research on ethics and authenticity must be more firmly grounded in the concepts of freedom, ambiguity, and intentionality.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 8, 2021
Online Publication Date Feb 27, 2021
Publication Date 2021-05
Deposit Date Jun 10, 2021
Publicly Available Date Feb 28, 2024
Journal Annals of Tourism Research
Print ISSN 0160-7383
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 88
Article Number 103174
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103174
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5654562
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160738321000360

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations