Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Factors associated with electrical stimulation‐induced performance fatigability are dependent upon stimulation location

Inns, Thomas B.; McCormick, Daniel; Greig, Carolyn A.; Atherton, Philip J.; Phillips, Bethan E.; Piasecki, Mathew

Factors associated with electrical stimulation‐induced performance fatigability are dependent upon stimulation location Thumbnail


Authors

Thomas B. Inns

Daniel McCormick

Carolyn A. Greig

PHILIP ATHERTON philip.atherton@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Clinical, metabolic & Molecular Physiology

BETH PHILLIPS beth.phillips@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Translational Physiology



Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is increasingly viewed as a central tenet to minimise muscle loss during periods of disuse/illness – typically applied directly over a muscle belly. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is afforded less attention, despite providing a more global contractile stimulus to muscles. We investigated NMES versus PNS in relation to performance fatigability and peripheral contributions to voluntary force capacity. Two fatigue protocols were assessed separately: (1) over‐quadriceps NMES and (2) peripheral (femoral) nerve stimulation (PNS). Before and after each session, a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was performed to assess force loss. Knee‐extensor force was measured throughout to assess contractile function in response to submaximal electrical stimulation, and M‐wave features quantified myoelectrical activity. NMES and PNS induced similar voluntary (MVC, NMES: −12 ± 9%, PNS: −10 ± 8%, both P ≤0.001) and stimulated (NMES: −45 ± 12%, PNS −27 ± 27%, both P ≤ 0.001) force reductions. Although distinct between protocols, myoelectrical indicators of muscle recruitment (M‐wave area and amplitude) and nerve conduction time did not change throughout either protocol. Myoelectrical propagation speed, represented as M‐wave duration, and the delay before muscle relaxation began both progressively increased during NMES only (P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively). NMES myoelectrical changes suggested performance fatigability, indicating activation of superficial fibres only, which was not observed with PNS. This suggests PNS recruits a wider pool of muscle fibres and motor units and is a favourable alternative for rehabilitation. Future work should focus on implementing PNS interventions in clinically relevant scenarios such as immobilisation, care homes and critical illness.

Citation

Inns, T. B., McCormick, D., Greig, C. A., Atherton, P. J., Phillips, B. E., & Piasecki, M. (2021). Factors associated with electrical stimulation‐induced performance fatigability are dependent upon stimulation location. Experimental Physiology, 106(4), 828-836. https://doi.org/10.1113/ep089204

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 23, 2021
Online Publication Date Feb 26, 2021
Publication Date Apr 1, 2021
Deposit Date Mar 9, 2021
Publicly Available Date Mar 16, 2021
Journal Experimental Physiology
Print ISSN 0958-0670
Electronic ISSN 1469-445X
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 106
Issue 4
Pages 828-836
DOI https://doi.org/10.1113/ep089204
Keywords Physiology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5377274
Publisher URL https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP089204

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations