Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Scientific floras can be reliable sources for some trait data in a system with poor coverage in global trait databases

Cutts, Vanessa; Hanz, Dagmar M.; Barajas-Barbosa, Martha Paola; Algar, Adam C.; Steinbauer, Manuel J.; Irl, Severin D. H.; Kreft, Holger; Weigelt, Patrick; Fernandez Palacios, Jose Mar�a; Field, Richard

Scientific floras can be reliable sources for some trait data in a system with poor coverage in global trait databases Thumbnail


Authors

Vanessa Cutts

Dagmar M. Hanz

Martha Paola Barajas-Barbosa

Adam C. Algar

Manuel J. Steinbauer

Severin D. H. Irl

Holger Kreft

Patrick Weigelt

Jose Mar�a Fernandez Palacios



Contributors

J�rgen Dengler
Editor

Abstract

Aim:
Trait?based approaches are increasingly important in ecology and biogeography, but progress is often hampered by the availability of high?quality quantitative trait data collected in the field. Alternative sources of trait information include scientific floras and taxonomic monographs. Here we test the reliability and usefulness of trait data acquired from scientific floras against trait values measured in the field, and those in TRY, the most comprehensive global plant trait database.

Location:
Tenerife and La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain.

Methods:
We measured leaf area and specific leaf area (SLA) in the field for 451 native vascular plant species and compared them with equivalent trait data digitised from the most recent and comprehensive guide of the Canarian flora, and data sourced from TRY. We regressed the field?measured traits against their equivalents estimated from the literature and used the regression models from one island to predict the trait values on the other island.

Results:
For leaf area, linear models showed good agreement between values from the scientific flora and those measured in the field (r2 = 0.86). These models were spatially transferable across islands. In contrast, for SLA we found a weak relationship between field?measured values and the best estimates from the scientific flora (r2 = 0.11). Insufficient data were available in the TRY database for our study area to calculate trait correlations with other data sources.

Conclusions:
Scientific floras can act as useful data sources for quantitative plant trait data for some traits but not others, whilst the TRY database contains many traits, but is incomplete in species coverage for our study region, and oceanic islands in general.

Citation

Cutts, V., Hanz, D. M., Barajas-Barbosa, M. P., Algar, A. C., Steinbauer, M. J., Irl, S. D. H., …Field, R. (2021). Scientific floras can be reliable sources for some trait data in a system with poor coverage in global trait databases. Journal of Vegetation Science, 32(3), Article e12996. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12996

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 3, 2021
Online Publication Date May 3, 2021
Publication Date May 1, 2021
Deposit Date Mar 5, 2021
Publicly Available Date May 1, 2021
Journal Journal of Vegetation Science
Print ISSN 1100-9233
Electronic ISSN 1654-1103
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 32
Issue 3
Article Number e12996
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12996
Keywords Plant Science; Ecology
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5368531
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.12996

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations