Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Provably Robust Decisions based on Potentially Malicious Sources of Information

Muller, Tim; Wang, Dongxia; Sun, Jun

Authors

TIM MULLER Tim.Muller@nottingham.ac.uk
Assistant Professor

Dongxia Wang

Jun Sun



Abstract

Sometimes a security-critical decision must be made using information provided by peers. Think of routing messages, user reports, sensor data, navigational information, blockchain updates. Attackers manifest as peers that strategically report fake information. Trust models use the provided information, and attempt to suggest the correct decision. A model that appears accurate by empirical evaluation of attacks may still be susceptible to manipulation. For a security-critical decision, it is important to take the entire attack space into account. Therefore, we define the property of robustness: the probability of deciding correctly, regardless of what information attackers provide. We introduce the notion of realisations of honesty, which allow us to bypass reasoning about specific feedback. We present two schemes that are optimally robust under the right assumptions. The “majority-rule” principle is a special case of the other scheme which is more general, named “most plausible realisations”.

Conference Name 2020 IEEE 33rd Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)
Conference Location Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Start Date Jun 22, 2020
End Date Jun 26, 2020
Acceptance Date Apr 20, 2020
Online Publication Date Aug 4, 2020
Publication Date Jun 22, 2020
Deposit Date Sep 18, 2023
Publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Pages 411-425
Book Title 2020 IEEE 33rd Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)
ISBN 9781728165738
DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/csf49147.2020.00036
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5227208
Publisher URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9155184