Dr CAROLINE HOAD CAROLINE.L.HOAD@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
SENIOR RESEARCH FELLOW
Investigations of Anti‐Reflux Formulations Containing Alginates Using MRI: A Feasibility Study Using Conventional 3.0T and 0.5T Open Upright Scanning
Hoad, Caroline L.; Knarr, Matthias; Aliyu, Abdulsalam; Mougin, Olivier; Paul, Jan Alappadan; Marciani, Luca
Authors
Matthias Knarr
Abdulsalam Aliyu
Mr OLIVIER MOUGIN OLIVIER.MOUGIN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
SENIOR RESEARCH FELLOW
Mr JAN ALAPPADAN PAUL JAN.PAUL@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
RESEARCH RADIOGRAPHER
Professor LUCA MARCIANI LUCA.MARCIANI@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF GASTROINTESTINAL IMAGING
Abstract
Sodium alginates are widely used for their gelling, thickening, and stabilizing properties. Raft-producing formulations have been used widely for many years to treat the symptoms of anti-reflux disease and those suffering occasional symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of characterizing rafts formed from alginate-containing anti-reflux formulations invivo using either a supine high-field 3T scanner or an upright low-field 0.5T MRI scanner. Six healthy participants (one male, five female, age range 23–50 years) attended three study visits following an overnight fast and were scanned at one field strength (N = 3 at 0.5T, N = 3 at 3T) before and after ingestion of an acidic drink followed by one of three different alginate antireflux formulations. These formulations had identical quantities (by mass) of sodium alginate, calcium carbonate, and sodium bicarbonate. Raft position and volume were measured along with gastric contents and gas using T2-weighted MRI. Additionally, the image textures of the raft and T2 properties were investigated at 3T. Invitro properties (raft strength, mass, and NMR chemical analysis) of the three different formulations were also determined. Alginate rafts were generated in all volunteers for all formulations. Gastric emptying of the acidic drink was consistent across all study days. Raft volumes measured showed some differences between body positions, with upright maintaining a higher volume of raft for longer. Invitro analysis showed significant differences in strength and mass between two of the formulations, which were likely caused by differences in the chemical structure of the alginates used in the formulations. In conclusion, characterization of anti-reflux alginate raft properties can be achieved using both low-field upright and high-field supine MRI. Larger scale studies are needed to determine the differences between formulations invivo.
Citation
Hoad, C., Knarr, M., Aliyu, A., Mougin, O., Paul, J., & Marciani, L. (2025). Investigations of Anti‐Reflux Formulations Containing Alginates Using MRI: A Feasibility Study Using Conventional 3.0T and 0.5T Open Upright Scanning. NMR in Biomedicine, 38(8), Article e70090. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70090
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 17, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 10, 2025 |
Publication Date | 2025-08 |
Deposit Date | Jul 14, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 15, 2025 |
Journal | NMR in Biomedicine |
Print ISSN | 0952-3480 |
Electronic ISSN | 1099-1492 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 38 |
Issue | 8 |
Article Number | e70090 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70090 |
Keywords | alginate, anti-reflux, gastric, MRI, raft strength |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/51611557 |
Publisher URL | https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nbm.70090 |
Files
Investigations of Anti-Reflux Formulations Containing Alginates Using MRI: A Feasibility Study Using Conventional 3.0T and 0.5T Open Upright Scanning
(2.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Structuring white rice with gellan gum reduces the glycemic response in healthy humans
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search