Annaliza Todd
Age specific recruitment and retention to a large multicentre observational breast cancer trial in older women: The Age Gap Trial
Todd, Annaliza; Martin, Charlene; Morgan, Jenna; Herbert, Esther; Bradburn, Mike; Burton, Maria; Reed, Malcolm W.R.; Chater, Tim; Pemberton, Kirsty; Walters, Stephen; Cheung, Kwok Leung; Audisio, Riccardo A.; Ring, Alistair; Robinson, Thompson; Green, Tracy; Gath, Jacqui; Wyld, Lynda
Authors
Charlene Martin
Jenna Morgan
Esther Herbert
Mike Bradburn
Maria Burton
Malcolm W.R. Reed
Tim Chater
Kirsty Pemberton
Stephen Walters
Professor KWOK_LEUNG CHEUNG KWOK_LEUNG.CHEUNG@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
DEPUTY HEAD OF EDUCATION & DIRECTOR OF THE BMBS MEDICINE PROGRAMMES
Riccardo A. Audisio
Alistair Ring
Thompson Robinson
Tracy Green
Jacqui Gath
Lynda Wyld
Abstract
Introduction
Recruitment and retention are two of the most important factors in successfully running clinical trials. Many trials encounter problems with both, causing delays or preventing study progress. These issues are greater in older adults and patients with cancer.
Materials and methods
We assessed recruitment and retention in a large, multicentre, observational breast cancer study in older female patients (>70 years, N = 3440). Data collected by the Age Gap study were used to assess rates of, and reasons for, patients not being recruited or retained. Statistical analysis assessed the impact of age as a predictor of recruitment and retention.
Results
Between February 2013 and June 2018, 6876 patients were screened and 3456 were consented across 56 United Kingdom (UK) breast units. Reasons for non-recruitment included ineligibility, clinician issues, staffing resource issues, patients' lack of interest or time and trial burden. In comparison with the age demographics of patients with breast cancer in the UK, women aged 70–75 years were over-represented compared to older age groups. Logistic regression demonstrated that older age significantly reduced the odds of consent (OR = 0.96, CI: 0.938–0.982; p [less than] 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age (p [less than] 0.001), markers of poor functional ability (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (p = 0.011)) and instrumental activities of daily living (p = 0.026) were significant predictors of withdrawal.
Discussion
This study has demonstrated that selection and attrition bias for age are apparent despite a range of ‘age friendly’ study design measures. Exploration of the underlying reasons for this and development of measures to address this should be the focus of further research.
Citation
Todd, A., Martin, C., Morgan, J., Herbert, E., Bradburn, M., Burton, M., Reed, M. W., Chater, T., Pemberton, K., Walters, S., Cheung, K. L., Audisio, R. A., Ring, A., Robinson, T., Green, T., Gath, J., & Wyld, L. (2021). Age specific recruitment and retention to a large multicentre observational breast cancer trial in older women: The Age Gap Trial. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 12(5), 714-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.015
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 21, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 27, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2021-06 |
Deposit Date | Nov 3, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 3, 2020 |
Journal | Journal of Geriatric Oncology |
Print ISSN | 1879-4068 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 12 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 714-723 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.015 |
Keywords | Oncology; Geriatrics and Gerontology |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/5014268 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406820304872 |
Files
Age specific recruitment and retention
(808 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search