Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Patents versus rewards: the implications of production inefficiency

Bagchi, Aniruddha; Mukherjee, Arijit

Patents versus rewards: the implications of production inefficiency Thumbnail


Authors

Aniruddha Bagchi

ARIJIT MUKHERJEE Arijit.Mukherjee@nottingham.ac.uk
Professor of Industrial Economics



Abstract

It is believed that if there is no informational asymmetry between firms and the government, firms could be remunerated for innovation using optimal taxation rather than patents. We show that under reasonable conditions (such as the government's inability to customise the tax rate for each firm), patent protection is preferable to a tax/subsidy scheme if the marginal costs of the imitators are sufficiently higher than that of the innovator. Otherwise, the tax/subsidy scheme is preferable. These results hold under Cournot and Bertrand competition with product differentiation, but not for the case of Bertrand competition with homogeneous products. We rationalise these findings as the results of a trade-off between the distortions induced by monopoly under patents and production inefficiency under the tax/subsidy scheme.

Citation

Bagchi, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2021). Patents versus rewards: the implications of production inefficiency. German Economic Review, 22(2), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1515/ger-2019-0092

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 10, 2020
Online Publication Date Oct 29, 2020
Publication Date May 1, 2021
Deposit Date Oct 12, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 30, 2022
Journal German Economic Review
Print ISSN 1465-6485
Electronic ISSN 1468-0475
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 22
Issue 2
Pages 215-234
DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/ger-2019-0092
Keywords Economics and Econometrics
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4959736

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations