Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Carbon footprint of a sample of clinical trials for people with neurological disorders: cross-sectional analysis

Cranley, Denise; Dunn, Sarah; Taylor, John-Paul; Desborough, Michael; Craig, Jennifer; Sprigg, Nikola; McComish, Rachel; Foltynie, Thomas; Wardlaw, Joanna M; Oatey, Katherine; Heye, Anna; Bath, Philip; Innes, Karen; Dinsmore, Lynn; Griffiths, Jessica; Fox, Lisa; Williamson, Paula R; Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam

Carbon footprint of a sample of clinical trials for people with neurological disorders: cross-sectional analysis Thumbnail


Authors

Denise Cranley

Sarah Dunn

John-Paul Taylor

Michael Desborough

Rachel McComish

Thomas Foltynie

Joanna M Wardlaw

Katherine Oatey

Anna Heye

Karen Innes

Lynn Dinsmore

Jessica Griffiths

Lisa Fox

Paula R Williamson

Rustam Al-Shahi Salman



Abstract

Objective: To quantify the carbon footprint of a sample of clinical trials for neurological disorders.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Method: Two clinical trial registries were searched on 29 December 2022 for phase 2–4 randomised controlled trials led from and recruiting in the UK, enrolling people with any of the 15 neurological disorders with the highest global burden, that had started recruitment or been registered in the preceding 5 years. Eligible trials were invited to share data to estimate emissions in each of the 10 modules of the Low Carbon Clinical Trials footprinting guidance. The primary outcome measure was kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e).

Results: 318 randomised controlled trials were found, nine were eligible and six shared data (three completed and three ongoing). The module with the highest estimated CO2e for each trial was the Clinical Trial Unit staff emissions (median 24 126 kg CO2e, IQR 10 395–78,867; range 45–79% of overall emissions of each trial); commuting accounted for >50% of CO2e in this module. The second and third highest modules were trial-specific participant assessments (median 11 497 kg CO2e, IQR 825–15,682) and trial supplies and equipment (median 1161 kg CO2e, IQR 226–6632). The total carbon footprint of these six trials involving 2248 participants at 239 sites was 2 63 215 kg CO2e.

Conclusions: Emissions by Clinical Trials Unit staff were the top modifiable carbon hotspot in six randomised controlled trials for people with neurological disorders, which had a total carbon footprint equivalent to 1364 passengers’ return aeroplane journeys between London and Edinburgh.

Citation

Cranley, D., Dunn, S., Taylor, J.-P., Desborough, M., Craig, J., Sprigg, N., McComish, R., Foltynie, T., Wardlaw, J. M., Oatey, K., Heye, A., Bath, P., Innes, K., Dinsmore, L., Griffiths, J., Fox, L., Williamson, P. R., & Al-Shahi Salman, R. (2025). Carbon footprint of a sample of clinical trials for people with neurological disorders: cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Open, 15(6), Article e090419. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090419

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 27, 2025
Online Publication Date Jun 17, 2025
Publication Date 2025-06
Deposit Date May 29, 2025
Publicly Available Date May 29, 2025
Journal BMJ Open
Electronic ISSN 2044-6055
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 15
Issue 6
Article Number e090419
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090419
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/49558064
Publisher URL https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/6/e090419

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations