Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparative optimism about infection and recovery from COVID‐19; Implications for adherence with lockdown advice

Asimakopoulou, Koula; Hoorens, Vera; Speed, Ewen; Coulson, Neil S.; Antoniszczak, Dominika; Collyer, Fran; Deschrijver, Eliane; Dubbin, Leslie; Faulks, Denise; Forsyth, Rowena; Goltsi, Vicky; Harsl�f, Ivan; Larsen, Kristian; Manaras, Irene; Olczak-Kowalczyk, Dorota; Willis, Karen; Xenou, Tatiana; Scambler, Sasha

Comparative optimism about infection and recovery from COVID‐19; Implications for adherence with lockdown advice Thumbnail


Authors

Koula Asimakopoulou

Vera Hoorens

Ewen Speed

Dominika Antoniszczak

Fran Collyer

Eliane Deschrijver

Leslie Dubbin

Denise Faulks

Rowena Forsyth

Vicky Goltsi

Ivan Harsl�f

Kristian Larsen

Irene Manaras

Dorota Olczak-Kowalczyk

Karen Willis

Tatiana Xenou

Sasha Scambler



Abstract

Background
Comparative optimism, the belief that negative events are more likely to happen to others rather than to oneself, is well established in health risk research. It is unknown, however, whether comparative optimism also permeates people’s health expectations and potentially behaviour during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Objectives
Data were collected through an international survey (N = 6485) exploring people’s thoughts and psychosocial behaviours relating to COVID‐19. This paper reports UK data on comparative optimism. In particular, we examine the belief that negative events surrounding risk and recovery from COVID‐19 are perceived as more likely to happen to others rather than to oneself.

Methods
Using online snowball sampling through social media, anonymous UK survey data were collected from N = 645 adults during weeks 5‐8 of the UK COVID‐19 lockdown. The sample was normally distributed in terms of age and reflected the UK ethnic and disability profile.

Findings
Respondents demonstrated comparative optimism where they believed that as compared to others of the same age and gender, they were unlikely to experience a range of controllable (eg accidentally infect/ be infected) and uncontrollable (eg need hospitalization/ intensive care treatment if infected) COVID‐19‐related risks in the short term (P [less than] .001). They were comparatively pessimistic (ie thinking they were more at risk than others for developing COVID‐19‐related infection or symptoms) when thinking about the next year.

Discussion
This is one of the first ever studies to report compelling comparative biases in UK adults’ thinking about COVID‐19.

Citation

Asimakopoulou, K., Hoorens, V., Speed, E., Coulson, N. S., Antoniszczak, D., Collyer, F., …Scambler, S. (2020). Comparative optimism about infection and recovery from COVID‐19; Implications for adherence with lockdown advice. Health Expectations, 23(6), 1502-1511. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13134

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 6, 2020
Online Publication Date Sep 27, 2020
Publication Date Dec 21, 2020
Deposit Date Jan 3, 2021
Publicly Available Date Jan 6, 2021
Journal Health Expectations
Print ISSN 1369-6513
Electronic ISSN 1369-7625
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 23
Issue 6
Pages 1502-1511
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13134
Keywords Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4938130
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.13134

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations