NEIL CHADBORN Neil.Chadborn@nottingham.ac.uk
Senior Research Fellow
Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes
Chadborn, Neil H.; Devi, Reena; Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn; Banerjee, Jay; Gordon, Adam L.
Authors
Reena Devi
Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith
Jay Banerjee
Adam L. Gordon
Abstract
Purpose
We conducted a scoping review of quality improvement in care homes. We aimed to identify participating occupational groups and methods for evaluation. Secondly, we aimed to describe resident-level interventions and which outcomes were measured.
Methods
Following extended PRISMA guideline for scoping reviews, we conducted systematic searches of Medline, CINAHL, Psychinfo, ASSIA (2000-2019). Furthermore, we searched systematic reviews databases including Cochrane Library and JBI, and the grey literature database, Greylit. Four co-authors contributed to selection and data extraction.
Results
65 studies were included, 6 of which had multiple publications (75 articles overall). A range of quality improvement strategies were implemented, including audit-feedback and quality improvement collaboratives. Methods consisted of controlled trials, quantitative time series and qualitative interview and observational studies. Process evaluations, involving staff of various occupational groups, described experiences and implementation measures. Many studies measured resident-level outputs and health outcomes. 14 studies reported improvements to a clinical measure, however four of these articles were of low quality. Larger randomized controlled studies did not show statistically significant benefits to resident health outcomes.
Conclusion
In care homes, quality improvement has been applied with several different strategies, being evaluated by a variety of measures. In terms of measuring benefits to residents, process outputs and health outcomes have been reported. There was no pattern of which quality improvement strategy was used for which clinical problem. Further development of reporting of quality improvement projects and outcomes could facilitate implementation.
Citation
Chadborn, N. H., Devi, R., Hinsliff-Smith, K., Banerjee, J., & Gordon, A. L. (2021). Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes. European Geriatric Medicine, 12, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 14, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 4, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2021-02 |
Deposit Date | Aug 14, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 5, 2021 |
Journal | European Geriatric Medicine |
Print ISSN | 1878-7649 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 12 |
Pages | 17-26 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w |
Keywords | Nursing home, Care home, Quality improvement, Scoping review, Older people |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4830903 |
Publisher URL | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w |
Files
Chadborn2020_Article_QualityImprovementInLong-termC
(694 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Breastfeeding in infants diagnosed with Phenylketonuria (PKU): a scoping review
(2023)
Journal Article
“It’s not just for the Past but it’s for the Here and Now”: Gift-Giver Perspectives on the Memory Machine to Gift Digital Memories
(2023)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search