Jatinder S Minhas
Comparative effects of intensive-versus standard-BP lowering treatment in patients with severe ischemic stroke in the ENCHANTED trial
Minhas, Jatinder S; Wang, Xia; Lindley, Richard I; Delcourt, Candice; Song, Lili; Woodward, Mark; Lee, Tsong-Hai; Broderick, Joseph P; Pontes-Neto, Octavio M; Kim, Jong S; Ricci, Stefano; Lavados, Pablo M; Bath, Philip M; Durham, Alice C; Wang, Ji-Guang; Sharma, Vijay K; Demchuk, Andrew M; Martins, Sheila O; Chalmers, John; Anderson, Craig S; Robinson, Thompson G
Authors
Xia Wang
Richard I Lindley
Candice Delcourt
Lili Song
Mark Woodward
Tsong-Hai Lee
Joseph P Broderick
Octavio M Pontes-Neto
Jong S Kim
Stefano Ricci
Pablo M Lavados
PHILIP BATH philip.bath@nottingham.ac.uk
Stroke Association Professor of Stroke Medicine
Alice C Durham
Ji-Guang Wang
Vijay K Sharma
Andrew M Demchuk
Sheila O Martins
John Chalmers
Craig S Anderson
Thompson G Robinson
Abstract
Objective: Limited data exist on the optimum level of systolic blood pressure (BP) in thrombolyzed patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to determine the effects of intensive BP lowering, specifically in patients with severe AIS who participated in the international, Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED).
Methods: Pre-specificed subgroup analyzes of the BP arm of ENCHANTED, a multicenter, partial-factorial, open, blinded outcome assessed trial, in which 2227 thrombolysis-eligible and treated AIS patients with elevated systolic BP (>150 mmHg) were randomized to intensive (target 130-140 mmHg) or guideline-recommended (10) baseline neurological scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The primary efficacy outcome was death or any disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] scores 2-6). The key safety outcome was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Treatment effects estimated in logistic regression models are reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: There were 1,311 patients (mean age 67 years; 37% female; median baseline NIHSS of 11 [range 6.0-15.0]) with severe AIS. Overall, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome of death or disability. However, intensive BP lowering significantly increased mortality (odds ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.13; P=0.014) compared to guideline BP lowering, despite significantly lowering clinician-reported ICH (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92; P=0.016).
Conclusion: Intensive BP lowering is associated with increased mortality in patients with severe AIS despite lowering the risk of ICH. Further randomized trials are required to provide reliable evidence over the optimum systolic BP target in the most serious type of AIS.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01422616
Citation
Minhas, J. S., Wang, X., Lindley, R. I., Delcourt, C., Song, L., Woodward, M., …Robinson, T. G. (2021). Comparative effects of intensive-versus standard-BP lowering treatment in patients with severe ischemic stroke in the ENCHANTED trial. Journal of Hypertension, 39(2), 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002640
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 4, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 6, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2021-02 |
Deposit Date | Aug 5, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 7, 2021 |
Journal | Journal of Hypertension |
Publisher | OMICS International |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 39 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 280-285 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002640 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4812965 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.lww.com/jhypertension/Abstract/2021/02000/Comparative_effects_of_intensive_blood_pressure.13.aspx |
Files
Severe_Stroke_Supplementary_Files__R1_Clean_260720
(605 Kb)
PDF
Severe Stroke Manuscript R1 Clean 030820
(385 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Dysphagia after stroke: research advances in treatment interventions
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search