Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparative effects of intensive-versus standard-BP lowering treatment in patients with severe ischemic stroke in the ENCHANTED trial

Minhas, Jatinder S; Wang, Xia; Lindley, Richard I; Delcourt, Candice; Song, Lili; Woodward, Mark; Lee, Tsong-Hai; Broderick, Joseph P; Pontes-Neto, Octavio M; Kim, Jong S; Ricci, Stefano; Lavados, Pablo M; Bath, Philip M; Durham, Alice C; Wang, Ji-Guang; Sharma, Vijay K; Demchuk, Andrew M; Martins, Sheila O; Chalmers, John; Anderson, Craig S; Robinson, Thompson G

Comparative effects of intensive-versus standard-BP lowering treatment in patients with severe ischemic stroke in the ENCHANTED trial Thumbnail


Authors

Jatinder S Minhas

Xia Wang

Richard I Lindley

Candice Delcourt

Lili Song

Mark Woodward

Tsong-Hai Lee

Joseph P Broderick

Octavio M Pontes-Neto

Jong S Kim

Stefano Ricci

Pablo M Lavados

PHILIP BATH philip.bath@nottingham.ac.uk
Stroke Association Professor of Stroke Medicine

Alice C Durham

Ji-Guang Wang

Vijay K Sharma

Andrew M Demchuk

Sheila O Martins

John Chalmers

Craig S Anderson

Thompson G Robinson



Abstract

Objective: Limited data exist on the optimum level of systolic blood pressure (BP) in thrombolyzed patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to determine the effects of intensive BP lowering, specifically in patients with severe AIS who participated in the international, Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED).

Methods: Pre-specificed subgroup analyzes of the BP arm of ENCHANTED, a multicenter, partial-factorial, open, blinded outcome assessed trial, in which 2227 thrombolysis-eligible and treated AIS patients with elevated systolic BP (>150 mmHg) were randomized to intensive (target 130-140 mmHg) or guideline-recommended (10) baseline neurological scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The primary efficacy outcome was death or any disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] scores 2-6). The key safety outcome was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Treatment effects estimated in logistic regression models are reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: There were 1,311 patients (mean age 67 years; 37% female; median baseline NIHSS of 11 [range 6.0-15.0]) with severe AIS. Overall, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome of death or disability. However, intensive BP lowering significantly increased mortality (odds ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.13; P=0.014) compared to guideline BP lowering, despite significantly lowering clinician-reported ICH (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92; P=0.016).

Conclusion: Intensive BP lowering is associated with increased mortality in patients with severe AIS despite lowering the risk of ICH. Further randomized trials are required to provide reliable evidence over the optimum systolic BP target in the most serious type of AIS.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01422616

Citation

Minhas, J. S., Wang, X., Lindley, R. I., Delcourt, C., Song, L., Woodward, M., …Robinson, T. G. (2021). Comparative effects of intensive-versus standard-BP lowering treatment in patients with severe ischemic stroke in the ENCHANTED trial. Journal of Hypertension, 39(2), 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002640

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 4, 2020
Online Publication Date Oct 6, 2020
Publication Date 2021-02
Deposit Date Aug 5, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 7, 2021
Journal Journal of Hypertension
Publisher OMICS International
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 39
Issue 2
Pages 280-285
DOI https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002640
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4812965
Publisher URL https://journals.lww.com/jhypertension/Abstract/2021/02000/Comparative_effects_of_intensive_blood_pressure.13.aspx

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations