Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparison of 25?hydroxyvitamin D concentration in chimpanzee dried blood spots and serum

Moitti�, Sophie; Graham, Peter A.; Barlow, Nicola; Dobbs, Phillipa; Liptovszky, Matyas; Redrobe, Sharon; White, Kate

Comparison of 25?hydroxyvitamin D concentration in chimpanzee dried blood spots and serum Thumbnail


Authors

Sophie Moitti�

Dr PETER GRAHAM PETER.GRAHAM@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Veterinary Clinical Pathology and Endocrinology

Nicola Barlow

Phillipa Dobbs

Matyas Liptovszky

Sharon Redrobe

KATE WHITE KATE.WHITE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia



Abstract

Background
Dried blood spots (DBS) are used in human medicine to measure total 25‐hydroxyvitamin D (25‐OHD) in the blood. However, this easy and affordable sampling technique has not been evaluated in primates to measure vitamin D concentrations.

Objectives
We aimed to compare 25‐OHD measurements in chimpanzee serum at two different laboratories and determine the precision and accuracy of the DBS method by comparing DBS and serum results.

Methods
Blood samples from 17 captive chimpanzees were collected, and 25‐OHD3 and 25‐OHD2 were measured in serum at two accredited laboratories using liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry. The same analytes were measured on DBS cards, and results were compared with that of serum. Data were assessed using the Spearman correlation, Deming regression, and Bland‐Altman analyses.

Results
The correlation coefficient between the two measurements in serum was r s = .51 (P = .04), and the mean bias was −1.25 ± 14.83. When comparing 25‐OHD concentrations measured in DBS and serum at the same laboratory, the r s was 0.7 (P = .002), and the mean bias was 1.42 ± 14.58. Estimated intra‐assay and inter‐assay coefficients of variation for DBS results were 6% and 12.6%, respectively.

Conclusions
Although substantial analytical variability was found in 25‐OHD measurements regardless of the sample type, the identification of both constant and proportional error and wider limits of agreement with the DBS technique makes the interpretation of DBS results challenging, especially for values close to clinical cut‐off points. The DBS and serum methods were not interchangeable, and further studies are needed to validate DBS samples for vitamin D measurements in chimpanzees.

Citation

Moittié, S., Graham, P. A., Barlow, N., Dobbs, P., Liptovszky, M., Redrobe, S., & White, K. (2020). Comparison of 25‐hydroxyvitamin D concentration in chimpanzee dried blood spots and serum. Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 49(2), 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/vcp.12863

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 6, 2019
Online Publication Date May 22, 2020
Publication Date 2020-06
Deposit Date May 26, 2020
Publicly Available Date May 26, 2020
Journal Veterinary Clinical Pathology
Print ISSN 0275-6382
Electronic ISSN 1939-165X
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 49
Issue 2
Pages 299-306
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/vcp.12863
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4501067
Publisher URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/vcp.12863

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations