Richard J. Cooper
Further challenges to medical dominance? the case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing
Cooper, Richard J.; Bissell, Paul; Ward, Paul; Murphy, Elizabeth; Anderson, Claire; Avery, Tony; James, Veronica; Lymn, Jo; Guillaume, Louise; Hutchinson, Allen; Ratcliffe, Julie
Authors
Paul Bissell
Paul Ward
Elizabeth Murphy
Professor CLAIRE ANDERSON CLAIRE.ANDERSON@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF SOCIAL PHARMACY
Professor TONY AVERY ANTHONY.AVERY@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Veronica James
Jo Lymn
Louise Guillaume
Allen Hutchinson
Julie Ratcliffe
Abstract
Doctors have traditionally been viewed as the dominant healthcare profession, with the authority to prescribe medicines, but recent non-medical prescribing initiatives have been viewed as possible challenges to such dominance. Using the example of the introduction of supplementary prescribing in the UK, this study sought to explore whether such initiatives represent a challenge to medical authority. Ten case study sites in England involving primary and secondary care and a range of clinical areas were used to undertake a total of 77 observations of supplementary prescribing consultations and interviews with 28 patients, 11 doctors and nurse and pharmacist prescribers at each site.
Supplementary prescribing was viewed positively by all participants but several doctors and patients appeared to lack awareness and understanding of supplementary prescribing. Continued medical authority was supported empirically in five areas: patients’ and supplementary prescribers’ perception of doctors as being hierarchically superior; doctors legitimation of nurses’ and pharmacists’ prescribing initially; doctors’ belief that they could control (particularly nurses’) access to prescribing training; supplementary prescribers’ frequent recourse to use doctors’ advice, coupled with doctors’ encouragement of such ‘knock on door’ prescribing advice policies; doctors’ denigration of most routine prescribing but claims that diagnosis was more skilled and key to medicine.
Supplementary prescribing appeared to be successfully accomplished in practice in a range of clinical settings and was acceptable to all involved but did not ultimately challenge medical dominance. However, more recent nurse and pharmacist independent prescribing (involving diagnosis) may represent a more significant threat.
Citation
Cooper, R. J., Bissell, P., Ward, P., Murphy, E., Anderson, C., Avery, T., James, V., Lymn, J., Guillaume, L., Hutchinson, A., & Ratcliffe, J. (2012). Further challenges to medical dominance? the case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing. Health, 16(2), 115 - 133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459310364159
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Jan 13, 2011 |
Publication Date | 2012-03 |
Deposit Date | Jan 27, 2025 |
Journal | Health |
Print ISSN | 1949-4998 |
Electronic ISSN | 1949-5005 |
Publisher | Scientific Research Publishing |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 16 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 115 - 133 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459310364159 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/44681508 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1363459310364159 |
You might also like
Evaluation of the Rational Drug Use (RDU) literacy among undergraduate students
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search