Ms KIRSTEN ELLIOTT KIRSTEN.ELLIOTT@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Research Intelligence Librarian
Google Scholar is not broken (yet), but there are alternatives
Elliott, Kirsten
Authors
Abstract
For many Google Scholar has become a critical piece of research infrastructure. Yet, revelations in the manipulability of its metrics and its inclusion of AI generated papers have led some to ask is it still functional? Kirsten Elliott argues rather than being broken, these issues reflect the limitations of any academic search tool, but for those done with the platform there are alternatives.
Citation
Elliott, K. (2024). Google Scholar is not broken (yet), but there are alternatives. [Digital]
Digital Artefact Type | Blog Post |
---|---|
Publication Date | Oct 22, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Jan 20, 2025 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/44420046 |
Additional Information | Blog post from the LSE Impact Blog |
External URL | https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2024/10/22/google-scholar-is-not-broken-yet-but-there-are-alternatives/ |
You might also like
Fair Library Jobs: Constructively Disrupting Recruitment
(2023)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Challenging poor recruitment practice: Fair Library Jobs
(2022)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Fenella Paton
(2018)
Book Chapter
Birth Control Clinics in Scotland, 1926 – c.1939
(2014)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search