Joanne Eaves
Transfer of congruency effects between Stroop and multiplication tasks: Evidence that retrieval of multiplication facts requires inhibitory control
Eaves, Joanne; Gilmore, Camilla; Hochman, Shachar; Cragg, Lucy
Authors
Camilla Gilmore
Shachar Hochman
Professor LUCY CRAGG lucy.cragg@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Abstract
Inhibitory control is classically considered a domain-general process, yet recent findings suggest it may operate in context-specific ways. This has important implications for theories in other cognitive domains, such as mathematics, in which inhibitory control is proposed to play a key role. Inhibitory control has been implicated in resolving interference between competing number facts when retrieving them from memory, yet clear evidence for this is lacking. Here we report two pre-registered experiments with adults that investigated transfer of inhibitory control between interleaved Stroop and multiplication fact retrieval trials. Experiment 1 (n = 450) measured the congruency sequence effect, where transfer of inhibitory control between trials leads to a reduced congruency effect following an incongruent trial. Experiment 2 (n = 370) measured transfer of the list-wide proportion congruency effect, where the congruency effect is reduced when incongruent trials are more frequent. We found evidence of transfer of the congruency sequence effect between Stroop and multiplication. This did not differ depending on whether the Stroop task used number or animal stimuli. There was no transfer of the list-wide proportion congruency effect. These results suggest that reactive, transient domain-general inhibitory control processes are involved in retrieving multiplication facts from memory. Our findings have implications for theories of cognitive control and mathematical cognition, but caution should be taken in interpreting implications for educational interventions.
Citation
Eaves, J., Gilmore, C., Hochman, S., & Cragg, L. (2025). Transfer of congruency effects between Stroop and multiplication tasks: Evidence that retrieval of multiplication facts requires inhibitory control. Cognition, 256, Article 106054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106054
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 19, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 10, 2025 |
Publication Date | 2025-03 |
Deposit Date | Jan 8, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 8, 2025 |
Journal | Cognition |
Print ISSN | 0010-0277 |
Electronic ISSN | 1873-7838 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 256 |
Article Number | 106054 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106054 |
Keywords | inhibitory control; congruency sequence effect; list-wide proportion congruency effect; multiplication fact retrieval; mathematical cognition |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/43951520 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724003408 |
Additional Information | This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Transfer of congruency effects between Stroop and multiplication tasks: Evidence that retrieval of multiplication facts requires inhibitory control; Journal Title: Cognition; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106054; Content Type: article; Copyright: © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
Files
Transfer of congruency effects between Stroop and multiplication tasks: Evidence that retrieval of multiplication facts requires inhibitory control
(1.5 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Endogenous control is insufficient for preventing attentional capture in children and adults
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search