Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Transfer of congruency effects between Stroop and multiplication tasks: Evidence that retrieval of multiplication facts requires inhibitory control

Eaves, Joanne; Gilmore, Camilla; Hochman, Shachar; Cragg, Lucy

Transfer of congruency effects between Stroop and multiplication tasks: Evidence that retrieval of multiplication facts requires inhibitory control Thumbnail


Authors

Joanne Eaves

Camilla Gilmore

Shachar Hochman



Abstract

Inhibitory control is classically considered a domain-general process, yet recent findings suggest it may operate in context-specific ways. This has important implications for theories in other cognitive domains, such as mathematics, in which inhibitory control is proposed to play a key role. Inhibitory control has been implicated in resolving interference between competing number facts when retrieving them from memory, yet clear evidence for this is lacking. Here we report two pre-registered experiments with adults that investigated transfer of inhibitory control between interleaved Stroop and multiplication fact retrieval trials. Experiment 1 (n = 450) measured the congruency sequence effect, where transfer of inhibitory control between trials leads to a reduced congruency effect following an incongruent trial. Experiment 2 (n = 370) measured transfer of the list-wide proportion congruency effect, where the congruency effect is reduced when incongruent trials are more frequent. We found evidence of transfer of the congruency sequence effect between Stroop and multiplication. This did not differ depending on whether the Stroop task used number or animal stimuli. There was no transfer of the list-wide proportion congruency effect. These results suggest that reactive, transient domain-general inhibitory control processes are involved in retrieving multiplication facts from memory. Our findings have implications for theories of cognitive control and mathematical cognition, but caution should be taken in interpreting implications for educational interventions.

Citation

Eaves, J., Gilmore, C., Hochman, S., & Cragg, L. (2025). Transfer of congruency effects between Stroop and multiplication tasks: Evidence that retrieval of multiplication facts requires inhibitory control. Cognition, 256, Article 106054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106054

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 19, 2024
Online Publication Date Jan 10, 2025
Publication Date 2025-03
Deposit Date Jan 8, 2025
Publicly Available Date Jan 8, 2025
Journal Cognition
Print ISSN 0010-0277
Electronic ISSN 1873-7838
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 256
Article Number 106054
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106054
Keywords inhibitory control; congruency sequence effect; list-wide proportion congruency effect; multiplication fact retrieval; mathematical cognition
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/43951520
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724003408
Additional Information This article is maintained by: Elsevier; Article Title: Transfer of congruency effects between Stroop and multiplication tasks: Evidence that retrieval of multiplication facts requires inhibitory control; Journal Title: Cognition; CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106054; Content Type: article; Copyright: © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations