Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Mobilization practices in critically ill children: A European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)

Ista, Erwin; Scholefield, Barnaby R; Manning, Joseph C; Harth, Irene; Gawronski, Orsola; Bartkowska-?niatkowska, Alicja; Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie; Kudchadkar, Sapna R.

Mobilization practices in critically ill children: A European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU) Thumbnail


Authors

Erwin Ista

Barnaby R Scholefield

Joseph C Manning

Irene Harth

Orsola Gawronski

Alicja Bartkowska-?niatkowska

Anne-Sylvie Ramelet

Sapna R. Kudchadkar



Abstract

Background Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe. Methods A two-day, cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence study was conducted in May and November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of physical therapy (PT)-or occupational therapy (OT)-provided mobility. Clinical data and data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety-events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for ?72 hours. Results Data of 456 children admitted to one of 38 participating PICUs from 16 European countries were collected (456 patient-days); 70% were under 3 years of age. The point prevalence of PT-and/or OT-provided mobility activities was 39% (179/456) (95% CI 34.7-43.9%) during the patient-days, with significant differences between European-regions. Nurses were involved in 72% (924/1283) of the mobility events, in the remaining 28%, PT/OT, physicians, family members or other professionals were involved. Of the factors studied, family presence was most strongly positively associated with out-of-bed mobilization (aOR 7.83, 95% CI 3.09-19.79). Invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube was negatively associated with out-of-bed mobility (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.68). Patients were completely immobile on 25% (115/341) of patient-days. Barriers to mobilization were reported on 38% of patient-days. The most common reported barriers were cardiovascular instability (n= 47, 10%), oversedation (n= 39, 9%), and medical contraindication (n=37, 8%). Potential safety-events occurred in 5.7% of all documented mobilization events. Conclusion

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 12, 2020
Online Publication Date Jun 24, 2020
Publication Date Jun 24, 2020
Deposit Date Sep 25, 2020
Publicly Available Date Oct 7, 2020
Journal Critical Care
Print ISSN 1574-4280
Electronic ISSN 1466-609X
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Article Number 368
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4236206
Publisher URL https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2
Additional Information The authors and EU PARK-PICU Collaborators.

Files





Downloadable Citations