Erwin Ista
Mobilization practices in critically ill children: A European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
Ista, Erwin; Scholefield, Barnaby R; Manning, Joseph C; Harth, Irene; Gawronski, Orsola; Bartkowska-?niatkowska, Alicja; Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie; Kudchadkar, Sapna R.
Authors
Barnaby R Scholefield
Joseph C Manning
Irene Harth
Orsola Gawronski
Alicja Bartkowska-?niatkowska
Anne-Sylvie Ramelet
Sapna R. Kudchadkar
Abstract
Background Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe. Methods A two-day, cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence study was conducted in May and November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of physical therapy (PT)-or occupational therapy (OT)-provided mobility. Clinical data and data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety-events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for ≥72 hours. Results Data of 456 children admitted to one of 38 participating PICUs from 16 European countries were collected (456 patient-days); 70% were under 3 years of age. The point prevalence of PT-and/or OT-provided mobility activities was 39% (179/456) (95% CI 34.7-43.9%) during the patient-days, with significant differences between European-regions. Nurses were involved in 72% (924/1283) of the mobility events, in the remaining 28%, PT/OT, physicians, family members or other professionals were involved. Of the factors studied, family presence was most strongly positively associated with out-of-bed mobilization (aOR 7.83, 95% CI 3.09-19.79). Invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube was negatively associated with out-of-bed mobility (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.68). Patients were completely immobile on 25% (115/341) of patient-days. Barriers to mobilization were reported on 38% of patient-days. The most common reported barriers were cardiovascular instability (n= 47, 10%), oversedation (n= 39, 9%), and medical contraindication (n=37, 8%). Potential safety-events occurred in 5.7% of all documented mobilization events. Conclusion
Citation
Ista, E., Scholefield, B. R., Manning, J. C., Harth, I., Gawronski, O., Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, A., Ramelet, A.-S., & Kudchadkar, S. R. (2020). Mobilization practices in critically ill children: A European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU). Critical Care, 24, Article 368. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 12, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 24, 2020 |
Publication Date | Jun 24, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Sep 25, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 7, 2020 |
Journal | Critical Care |
Print ISSN | 1574-4280 |
Electronic ISSN | 1875-7081 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 24 |
Article Number | 368 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/4236206 |
Publisher URL | https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2 |
Additional Information | The authors and EU PARK-PICU Collaborators. |
Files
Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
(772 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search