Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Application of the world guidelines for falls prevention and management’s risk stratification algorithm to patients on a frailty intervention pathway and the potential utility of sensory impairment information

Katiri, Roulla; Holman, Jack A.; Magner, Siobhán; O’Caheny, Cian; Byrne, Colm P.

Application of the world guidelines for falls prevention and management’s risk stratification algorithm to patients on a frailty intervention pathway and the potential utility of sensory impairment information Thumbnail


Authors

Roulla Katiri

Dr JACK HOLMAN JACK.HOLMAN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION HEARING FELLOWSHIP

Siobhán Magner

Cian O’Caheny

Colm P. Byrne



Abstract

Background: The 2022 world guidelines for falls prevention and management suggest measuring sensory function including dizziness, vision, and hearing. These variables are not included in the falls risk stratification algorithm. This study sought to investigate the utility of the guidelines and potential avenues for improvement. This study applied the falls risk stratification recommendations and reviewed the individual sensory impairment risk factor variables predictive of falls and falls risk grouping in those assessed by a frailty intervention team (FIT) based in an emergency department (ED). Methods: Patients over 65 years old who attended the ED and had a comprehensive geriatric assessment carried out by FIT over a period of four months were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Patient characteristics, medication, physical and sensory function status data was retrieved and analysed with respect to falls and falls risk grouping. Results: Data was gathered retrospectively from 392 patients. Excluding those with missing data, almost all attendees were in the high-risk of falls category (n = 170, 43.4%), or the low-risk category (n = 149, 38.0%). Few people were in the intermediate-risk category (n = 19, 4.8%). Hearing loss and dizziness were significantly associated with falls incidence, whereas vision and balance were not. Hearing loss, balance and dizziness were significantly associated with risk grouping, whereas vision was not. Conclusions: Most older adults included in the analysis fell into the low- or high-risk categories, with a minority in the intermediate-risk category. This suggests that the inclusion criteria for the intermediate category could be altered for greater sensitivity. While impaired balance and vision were the most common impairments, hearing status, balance and dizziness were associated with risk group. These results, through a practical application of the world guidelines for falls to an acute clinical sample, raise the possibility of refining the falls risk stratification criteria, and highlight the capacity for additional sensory intervention to mitigate falls risk.

Citation

Katiri, R., Holman, J. A., Magner, S., O’Caheny, C., & Byrne, C. P. (2024). Application of the world guidelines for falls prevention and management’s risk stratification algorithm to patients on a frailty intervention pathway and the potential utility of sensory impairment information. BMC Geriatrics, 24(1), Article 824. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05405-3

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 25, 2024
Online Publication Date Oct 12, 2024
Publication Date Oct 12, 2024
Deposit Date Dec 11, 2024
Publicly Available Date Dec 13, 2024
Journal BMC Geriatrics
Electronic ISSN 1471-2318
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Issue 1
Article Number 824
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05405-3
Keywords Elderly, Falls prevention, Falls, Frailty, Sensory function
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/40590752
Publisher URL https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-024-05405-3
Additional Information Received: 13 May 2024; Accepted: 25 September 2024; First Online: 12 October 2024; : ; : This study was approved by the local Institutional Research Board (Reference number: CA23-011, approved 22/02/2023) and the requirement for explicit consent was not required in line with S.I. No. 18/2021 - Data Protection Act 2018 (Sect.36(2)) (Health Research) (Amendment) Regulations 2021.; : Not applicable.; : The authors declare no competing interests.

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations