Katherine E. Memory
Capturing and reporting topical treatment use in childhood eczema: lessons for data collection in eczema trials
Memory, Katherine E.; Macneill, Stephanie J.; Thomas, Kim S.; Santer, Miriam; Ridd, Matthew J.
Authors
Stephanie J. Macneill
Professor KIM THOMAS KIM.THOMAS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF APPLIED DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH
Miriam Santer
Matthew J. Ridd
Abstract
Background
Emollients and topical corticosteroids (TCS) prevent and treat flares in eczema. However, topical treatment use is poorly recorded and reported in clinical trials. There is no clear consensus of how best to capture and summarise topical treatment use.
Objectives
To explore different ways of capturing and reporting topical treatment use in childhood eczema.
Methods
Secondary data analysis using 450 participants from the Best Emollients for Eczema (BEE) trial. Participants were allocated to use one type of emollient (lotion, cream, gel, or ointment) ‘twice daily and when required’ for 16 weeks. Otherwise, clinical management remained unchanged. Parents completed weekly questions about topical therapy use and eczema symptoms. Two versions of topical treatment use questionnaires were used. The first (n=202, 44.9%) asked parents to report treatment use on days 1-7, starting completion on the day they were randomised. The second (n=248, 55.1%) reported use by day of the week (Monday to Sunday), starting completion the first Monday after randomisation. Both underwent Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) review, but the second version was tested more thoroughly using cognitive interviewing techniques, following parent feedback that questions on the first version were confusing. Descriptive statistics compared questionnaire completion and differences in emollient and TCS use.
Results
Overall, questionnaire completion for both emollient and TCS use decreased with time: but at weeks 1 and 16 were 84.7% (381/450) and 58.9% (265/450) for emollient use, and 94.2% (424/450) and 80.4% (362/450) for TCS use, respectively. Fewer emollient use questionnaires were completed with first (33.5%) than the second (87.9%) version (p<0.001). TCS use questionnaire completion were similar for both (84.9% and 87.4%, p=0.002). We present different ways of summarising topical treatment use.
Conclusions
While questionnaire completion was similar for TCS use, emollient use data completeness was higher in the second version. When designing questionnaires, balancing the detail and complexity of questions is important, especially if being collected as a secondary outcome measure. Numerous ways of summarising the same data can provide different information. Future collection and reporting of treatment use should reflect specific trial aims.
Citation
Memory, K. E., Macneill, S. J., Thomas, K. S., Santer, M., & Ridd, M. J. (2024). Capturing and reporting topical treatment use in childhood eczema: lessons for data collection in eczema trials. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llae328
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 16, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 18, 2024 |
Publication Date | Aug 18, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Sep 19, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 23, 2024 |
Journal | Clinical and Experimental Dermatology |
Print ISSN | 0307-6938 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2230 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llae328 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/38383975 |
Publisher URL | https://academic.oup.com/ced/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ced/llae328/7735387 |
Files
accepted manuscript
(1.4 Mb)
PDF
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Emollient application from birth to prevent eczema in high-risk children: the BEEP RCT
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search