Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health

Ntoumanis, Nikos; Ng, Johan Y.Y.; Prestwich, Andrew; Quested, Eleanor; Hancox, Jennie E.; Th�gersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie; Deci, Edward L.; Ryan, Richard M.; Lonsdale, Chris; Williams, Geoffrey C.

A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health Thumbnail


Authors

Nikos Ntoumanis

Johan Y.Y. Ng

Andrew Prestwich

Eleanor Quested

Jennie E. Hancox

Cecilie Th�gersen-Ntoumani

Edward L. Deci

Richard M. Ryan

Chris Lonsdale

Geoffrey C. Williams



Abstract

© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. There are no literature reviews that have examined the impact of health-domain interventions, informed by self-determination theory (SDT), on SDT constructs and health indices. Our aim was to meta-analyse such interventions in the health promotion and disease management literatures. Studies were eligible if they used an experimental design, tested an intervention that was based on SDT, measured at least one SDT-based motivational construct, and at least one indicator of health behaviour, physical health, or psychological health. Seventy-three studies met these criteria and provided sufficient data for the purposes of the review. A random-effects meta-analytic model showed that SDT-based interventions produced small-to-medium changes in most SDT constructs at the end of the intervention period, and in health behaviours at the end of the intervention period and at the follow-up. Small positive changes in physical and psychological health outcomes were also observed at the end of the interventions. Increases in need support and autonomous motivation (but not controlled motivation or amotivation) were associated with positive changes in health behaviour. In conclusion, SDT-informed interventions positively affect indices of health; these effects are modest, heterogeneous, and partly due to increases in self-determined motivation and support from social agents.

Citation

Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y., Prestwich, A., Quested, E., Hancox, J. E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., …Williams, G. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychology Review, 15(2), 214-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 16, 2020
Online Publication Date Jan 27, 2020
Publication Date 2021
Deposit Date Jan 30, 2020
Publicly Available Date Mar 11, 2020
Journal Health Psychology Review
Print ISSN 1743-7199
Electronic ISSN 1743-7202
Publisher Routledge
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 15
Issue 2
Pages 214-244
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529
Keywords Clinical Psychology; Psychiatry and Mental health
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3827204
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529

Files





Downloadable Citations