Simon Conroy
A multicentre randomised controlled trial of day hospital-based falls prevention programme for a screened population of community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls
Conroy, Simon; Kendrick, Denise; Harwood, Rowan; Gladman, John; Coupland, Carol; Sach, Tracey; Drummond, Avril; Youde, Jane; Edmans, Judi; Masud, Tahir
Authors
Professor DENISE KENDRICK DENISE.KENDRICK@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF PRIMARY CARE RESEARCH
Professor Rowan Harwood Rowan.Harwood@nottingham.ac.uk
CLINICAL CONSULTANT (PROFESSOR)
John Gladman
Professor CAROL COUPLAND carol.coupland@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF MEDICAL STATISTICS
Tracey Sach
Professor AVRIL DRUMMOND AVRIL.DRUMMOND@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF HEALTHCARE RESEARCH
Jane Youde
Judi Edmans
Tahir Masud
Abstract
Objective:
To determine the clinical effectiveness of a day hospital-delivered multifactorial falls prevention programme, for community-dwelling older people at high risk of future falls identified through a screening process.
Design:
Multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Eight general practices and three day hospitals based in the East Midlands, UK.
Participants:
Three hundred and sixty-four participants, mean age 79 years, with a median of three falls risk factors per person at baseline.
Interventions:
A day hospital-delivered multifactorial falls prevention programme, consisting of strength and balance training, a medical review and a home hazards assessment.
Main outcome measure:
Rate of falls over 12 months of follow-up, recorded using self-completed monthly diaries.
Results:
One hundred and seventy-two participants in each arm contributed to the primary outcome analysis. The overall falls rate during follow-up was 1.7 falls per person-year in the intervention arm compared with 2.0 falls per person-year in the control arm. The stratum-adjusted incidence rate ratio was 0.86 (95% CI 0.73–1.01), P = 0.08, and 0.73 (95% CI 0.51–1.03), P = 0.07 when adjusted for baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control arms in any secondary outcomes.
Conclusion:
This trial did not conclusively demonstrate the benefit of a day hospital-delivered multifactorial falls prevention programme, in a population of older people identified as being at high risk of a future fall.
Citation
Conroy, S., Kendrick, D., Harwood, R., Gladman, J., Coupland, C., Sach, T., Drummond, A., Youde, J., Edmans, J., & Masud, T. (2010). A multicentre randomised controlled trial of day hospital-based falls prevention programme for a screened population of community-dwelling older people at high risk of falls. Age and Ageing, 39(6), 704–710. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq096
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 17, 2010 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 7, 2010 |
Publication Date | Nov 1, 2010 |
Deposit Date | Feb 16, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 28, 2025 |
Journal | Age and Ageing |
Print ISSN | 0002-0729 |
Electronic ISSN | 1468-2834 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 39 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 704–710 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq096 |
Keywords | Accidental falls, screening, primary care, comprehensive geriatric assessment, randomised controlled trial, elderly |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/36306016 |
Publisher URL | https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article/39/6/704/9279 |
Files
afq096
(483 Kb)
PDF
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Copyright Statement
©The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.