GEORGIA CLANCY Georgia.Clancy@nottingham.ac.uk
Research Fellow
A mixed-methods study of women's birthplace preferences and decisions in England
Clancy, Georgia E; Boardman, Felicity K; Rees, Sophie
Authors
Felicity K Boardman
Sophie Rees
Abstract
Problem: Choice has been a key aspect of maternity care policy in England since 1993, however a gap remains between the birthplaces women want and where they actually give birth.
Background: The latest maternity care policy in England acknowledges that women are not being given ‘real choice’ in their care and often being told what to do. This is problematic since unfulfilled preferences have been linked to negative childbirth experiences.
Aim: To understand the factors affecting women’s birthplace preferences and decisions, and why these might differ.
Methods: A sequential mixed-methods study consisting of an online questionnaire (n=49) and follow-up interviews (n=14) with women who were either currently pregnant or had recently given birth in a metropolitan region in England.
Findings: Most women in this study said that they would prefer to give birth in an alongside maternity unit because it offered a compromise between the risk of poor outcomes and risk of unnecessary medicalisation. However, the majority of women’s preferences were medicalised at the point of decision-making as the minimisation of clinical risk was ultimately prioritised.
Discussion: Women’s preference for the alongside maternity unit demonstrates the growing popularity for this less medicalised, ‘alternative’ birthplace option. However pre-existing conditions, reproductive histories and experiential knowledge influence women’s decision to give birth in the labour ward and suggests that minimising clinical risk is women’s key priority.
Conclusion: Women navigate complex and competing discourses when forming childbirth preferences and making decisions, selectively considering different risks and knowledges to make the decisions right for them.
Citation
Clancy, G. E., Boardman, F. K., & Rees, S. (2024). A mixed-methods study of women's birthplace preferences and decisions in England. Women and Birth, 37(4), Article 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101616
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 9, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 22, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024-07 |
Deposit Date | Apr 22, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 29, 2024 |
Journal | Women and Birth |
Print ISSN | 1871-5192 |
Electronic ISSN | 1878-1799 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 37 |
Issue | 4 |
Article Number | 101616 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101616 |
Keywords | Childbirth choices; Birthplace preferences; Alongside maternity unit; Labour ward; Better Births; Mixed methods |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/34097463 |
Files
1-s2.0-S1871519224000647-main
(457 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Midwives.
You might also like
Realist inquiry into Maternity care @ a Distance (ARM@DA): realist review protocol
(2022)
Journal Article
How Can Digital Consultations Best Be Used In Maternity Care?
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search