Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Is personal recovery a transdiagnostic concept? Testing the fit of the CHIME framework using narrative experiences

Lases, Mitch N.; Bruins, Jojanneke; Scheepers, Floortje E.; van Sambeek, Nienke; Ng, Fiona; Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan; Slade, Mike; van Balkom, Ingrid D.C.; Castelein, Stynke

Is personal recovery a transdiagnostic concept? Testing the fit of the CHIME framework using narrative experiences Thumbnail


Authors

Mitch N. Lases

Jojanneke Bruins

Floortje E. Scheepers

Nienke van Sambeek

Profile image of FIONA NG

DR FIONA NG FIONA.NG@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Principal Research Fellow

MIKE SLADE M.SLADE@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Mental Health Recovery and Social Inclusion

Ingrid D.C. van Balkom

Stynke Castelein



Abstract

Background
Personal recovery is operationalized in the CHIME framework (connectedness, hope, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment) of recovery processes. CHIME was initially developed through analysis of experiences of people mainly with psychosis, but it might also be valid for investigating recovery in mood-related, autism and other diagnoses.

Aims
To examine whether personal recovery is transdiagnostic by studying narrative experiences in several diagnostic groups.

Methods
Thirty recovery narratives, retrieved from “Psychiatry Story Bank” (PSB) in the Netherlands, were analyzed by three coders using CHIME as a deductive framework. New codes were assigned using an inductive approach and member checks were performed after consensus was reached.

Results
All five CHIME dimensions were richly reported in the narratives, independent of diagnosis. Seven new domains were identified, such as “acknowledgement by diagnosis” and “gaining self-insight”. These new domains were evaluated to fit well as subdomains within the original CHIME framework. On average, 54.2% of all narrative content was classified as experienced difficulties.

Conclusions
Recovery stories from different diagnostic perspectives fit well into the CHIME framework, implying that personal recovery is a transdiagnostic concept. Difficulties should not be ignored in the context of personal recovery based on its substantial presence in the recovery narratives.

Citation

Lases, M. N., Bruins, J., Scheepers, F. E., van Sambeek, N., Ng, F., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Slade, M., van Balkom, I. D., & Castelein, S. (2024). Is personal recovery a transdiagnostic concept? Testing the fit of the CHIME framework using narrative experiences. Journal of Mental Health, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2361225

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 23, 2024
Online Publication Date Jun 30, 2024
Publication Date Jun 30, 2024
Deposit Date Apr 4, 2024
Publicly Available Date Jul 1, 2025
Journal Journal of Mental Health
Print ISSN 0963-8237
Electronic ISSN 1360-0567
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2024.2361225
Keywords Autism; stories; psychosis; severe mental illness; rehabilitation; Recovery
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/33290800
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2024.2361225
Additional Information Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=ijmh20; Received: 2023-06-27; Accepted: 2024-03-23; Published: 2024-06-30

Files

Is personal recovery a transdiagnostic concept Testing the fit of the CHIME framework using narrative experiences (1.5 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group





You might also like



Downloadable Citations