Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) revisited. Suggestions for the development of an enhanced general food motivation model

Fotopoulos, Christos; Krystallis, Athanasios; Vassallo, Marco; Pagiaslis, Anastasios

Authors

Christos Fotopoulos

Athanasios Krystallis

Marco Vassallo



Abstract

Recognising the need for a more statistically robust instrument to investigate general food selection determinants, the research validates and confirms Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ's) factorial design, develops ad hoc a more robust FCQ version and tests its ability to discriminate between consumer segments in terms of the importance they assign to the FCQ motivational factors. The original FCQ appears to represent a comprehensive and reliable research instrument. However, the empirical data do not support the robustness of its 9-factorial design. On the other hand, segmentation results at the subpopulation level based on the enhanced FCQ version bring about an optimistic message for the FCQ's ability to predict food selection behaviour. The paper concludes that some of the basic components of the original FCQ can be used as a basis for a new general food motivation typology. The development of such a new instrument, with fewer, of higher abstraction FCQ-based dimensions and fewer items per dimension, is a right step forward; yet such a step should be theory-driven, while a rigorous statistical testing across and within population would be necessary. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Citation

Fotopoulos, C., Krystallis, A., Vassallo, M., & Pagiaslis, A. (2009). Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) revisited. Suggestions for the development of an enhanced general food motivation model. Appetite, 52(1), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.014

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 20, 2008
Online Publication Date Sep 25, 2008
Publication Date Feb 1, 2009
Deposit Date Nov 2, 2020
Journal Appetite
Print ISSN 0195-6663
Electronic ISSN 1095-8304
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 52
Issue 1
Pages 199-208
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.014
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3184297
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195666308005722