Bernhard Chapligin
Inter-laboratory comparison of oxygen isotope compositions from biogenic silica
Chapligin, Bernhard; Leng, Melanie J.; Webb, Elizabeth; Alexandre, Anne; Dodd, Justin P.; Ijiri, Akira; Lücke, Andreas; Shemesh, Aldo; Abelmann, Andrea; Herzschuh, Ulrike; Longstaffe, Fred J.; Meyer, Hanno; Moschen, Robert; Okazaki, Yusuke; Rees, Nicholas H.; Sharp, Zachary D.; Sloane, Hilary J.; Sonzogni, Corinne; Swann, George E.A.; Sylvestre, Florence; Tyler, Jonathan J.; Yam, Ruth
Authors
Professor MELANIE LENG Melanie.Leng@nottingham.ac.uk
PROFESSOR OF ISOTOPE GEOSCIENCES
Elizabeth Webb
Anne Alexandre
Justin P. Dodd
Akira Ijiri
Andreas Lücke
Aldo Shemesh
Andrea Abelmann
Ulrike Herzschuh
Fred J. Longstaffe
Hanno Meyer
Robert Moschen
Yusuke Okazaki
Nicholas H. Rees
Zachary D. Sharp
Hilary J. Sloane
Corinne Sonzogni
Professor GEORGE SWANN GEORGE.SWANN@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY
Florence Sylvestre
Jonathan J. Tyler
Ruth Yam
Abstract
Several techniques have been introduced in the last decades for the dehydration and release of O2 from biogenic silica (opal-A) for oxygen-isotope analysis. However, only one silica standard is universally available: a quartz standard (NBS28) distributed by the IAEA, Vienna. Hence, there is a need for biogenic silica working standards. This paper compares the existing methods of oxygen-isotope analyses of opal-A and aims to characterize additional possible working standards to calibrate the δ18O values of biogenic silica. For this purpose, an inter-laboratory comparison was organized. Six potential working standard materials were analysed repeatedly against NBS28 by eight participating laboratories using their specific analytical methods. The materials cover a wide range of δ18O values (+23 to +43‰) and include diatoms (marine, lacustrine), phytoliths and synthetically-produced hydrous silica. To characterize the proposed standards, chemical analyses and imaging by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were also performed. Despite procedural differences at each laboratory, all methods are in reasonable agreement with a standard deviation (SD) for δ18O values between 0.3‰ and 0.9‰ (1σ). Based on the results, we propose four additional biogenic silica working standards (PS1772-8: 42.8‰; BFC: 29.0‰; MSG60: 37.0‰; G95-25-CL leaves: 36.6‰) for δ18O analyses, available on request through the relevant laboratories. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.
Citation
Chapligin, B., Leng, M. J., Webb, E., Alexandre, A., Dodd, J. P., Ijiri, A., Lücke, A., Shemesh, A., Abelmann, A., Herzschuh, U., Longstaffe, F. J., Meyer, H., Moschen, R., Okazaki, Y., Rees, N. H., Sharp, Z. D., Sloane, H. J., Sonzogni, C., Swann, G. E., Sylvestre, F., …Yam, R. (2011). Inter-laboratory comparison of oxygen isotope compositions from biogenic silica. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 75(22), 7242-7256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.011
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 7, 2011 |
Publication Date | Nov 15, 2011 |
Deposit Date | Feb 13, 2025 |
Journal | Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta |
Print ISSN | 0016-7037 |
Electronic ISSN | 1872-9533 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 75 |
Issue | 22 |
Pages | 7242-7256 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.011 |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3178738 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703711004674?via%3Dihub |
You might also like
South Georgia marine productivity over the past 15 ka and implications for glacial evolution
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search