Acceptability of a proposed practice pharmacist-led review for opioid-treated patients with persistent pain: A qualitative study to inform intervention development

Knaggs, Roger; Cornwall, Nicola; Woodcock, Charlotte; Ashworth, Julie; Harrisson, Sarah A; Dikomitis, Lisa; White, Simon; Helliwell, Toby; Hodgson, Eleanor; Pincus, Tamar; Santer, Miriam; Mallen, Christian D; Jinks, Clare; on behalf of the PROMPPT team

Abstract

Introduction Regular review of patients prescribed opioids for persistent non-cancer pain (PCNP) is recommended but not routinely undertaken. The PROMPPT (Proactive clinical Review of patients taking Opioid Medicines long-term for persistent Pain led by clinical Pharmacists in primary care Teams) research programme aims to develop and test a pharmacist-led pain review (PROMPPT) to reduce inappropriate opioid use for persistent pain in primary care. This study explored the acceptability of the proposed PROMPPT review to inform early intervention development. Methods Interviews ( n = 15) and an online discussion forum ( n = 31) with patients prescribed opioids for PCNP and interviews with pharmacists ( n = 13), explored acceptability of a proposed PROMPPT review. A prototype PROMPPT review was then tested and refined through 3 iterative cycles of in-practice testing (IPT) ( n = 3 practices, n = 3 practice pharmacists, n = 13 patients). Drawing on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA), a framework was generated (including a priori TFA constructs) allowing for deductive and inductive thematic analysis to identify aspects of prospective and experienced acceptability. Results Patients felt uncertain about practice pharmacists delivering the proposed PROMPPT review leading to development of content for the invitation letter for IPT (introducing the pharmacist and outlining the aim of the review). After IPT, patients felt that pharmacists were suited to the role as they were knowledgeable and qualified. Pharmacists felt that the proposed reviews would be challenging. Although challenges were experienced during delivery of PROMPPT reviews, pharmacists found that they became easier to deliver with time, practise and experience. Recommendations for optimisations after IPT included development of the training to include examples of challenging consultations. Conclusions Uptake of new healthcare interventions is influenced by perceptions of acceptability. Exploring prospective and experienced acceptability at multiple time points during early intervention development, led to mini-optimisations of the prototype PROMPPT review ahead of a non-randomised feasibility study.

Citation

Cornwall, N., Knaggs, R., Woodcock, C., Ashworth, J., Harrisson, S. A., Dikomitis, L., …on behalf of the PROMPPT team. (2024). Acceptability of a proposed practice pharmacist-led review for opioid-treated patients with persistent pain: A qualitative study to inform intervention development. British Journal of Pain, 18(3), 274-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637231221688

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Nov 23, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Dec 19, 2023
• Publication Date: 2024-06
• Deposit Date: Dec 20, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Jan 3, 2024
• Journal: British Journal of Pain
• Print ISSN: 2049-4637
• Electronic ISSN: 2049-4645
• Publisher: SAGE Publications
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 274-291
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637231221688
• Keywords: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/28710156
• Publisher URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20494637231221688
• Additional Information: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).