Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease by ultrasonography: how many and which sites should be scanned?

Cipolletta, Edoardo; Moscioni, Erica; Sirotti, Silvia; Di Battista, Jacopo; Abhishek, Abhishek; Rozza, Davide; Zanetti, Anna; Carrara, Greta; Scirè, Carlo Alberto; Grassi, Walter; Filippou, Georgios; Filippucci, Emilio

Diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease by ultrasonography: how many and which sites should be scanned? Thumbnail


Authors

Edoardo Cipolletta

Erica Moscioni

Silvia Sirotti

Jacopo Di Battista

Davide Rozza

Anna Zanetti

Greta Carrara

Carlo Alberto Scirè

Walter Grassi

Georgios Filippou

Emilio Filippucci



Abstract

Objective

To develop the optimal US scanning protocol for the diagnosis of CPPD disease.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, consecutive patients with a crystal-proven diagnosis of CPPD disease, and age-, sex-matched disease controls and with a negative synovial fluid analysis were prospectively enrolled in two Italian Institutions. Four rheumatologists, blinded to patients’ clinical details, performed US examinations using a standardised scanning protocol including 20 joints (shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints from 2nd to 5th fingers, hips, knees, ankles). CPPD was identified as presence/absence, according to the OMERACT definitions. Reduced US scanning protocols were developed by selecting the most informative joints to be imaged by US using the LASSO technique. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Their diagnostic accuracy was tested comparing the area under the ROC curves.

Results

204 participants were enrolled: 102 with CPPD disease and 102 disease controls [age (mean±standard deviation) 71.3 ± 12.0 vs 71.1 ± 13.5 years, female: 62.8% vs 57.8%].

The median number of joints with US evidence of CPPD was 5 (IQR: 4–7) and 0 (IQR: 0–1) in patients with CPPD disease and controls, respectively (p< 0 01).

The detection of CPPD in ≥ 2 joints using a reduced scanning protocol (bilateral assessment of knees, wrists, and hips) showed a sensitivity of 96.7% (95%CI: 82.8–99.9) and a specificity of 100 (95%CI: 88.8–100.0) for the diagnosis of CPPD disease and had good feasibility [(mean±standard deviation) 12.5 ± 5.3 min].

Conclusion

Bilateral US assessment of knees, wrists, and hips had excellent accuracy and good feasibility for the diagnosis of CPPD disease.

Citation

Cipolletta, E., Moscioni, E., Sirotti, S., Di Battista, J., Abhishek, A., Rozza, D., Zanetti, A., Carrara, G., Scirè, C. A., Grassi, W., Filippou, G., & Filippucci, E. (2024). Diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease by ultrasonography: how many and which sites should be scanned?. Rheumatology, 63(8), 2205-2212. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead565

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 5, 2023
Online Publication Date Oct 26, 2023
Publication Date 2024-08
Deposit Date Oct 30, 2023
Publicly Available Date Oct 30, 2023
Journal Rheumatology
Print ISSN 1462-0324
Electronic ISSN 1462-0332
Publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 63
Issue 8
Pages 2205-2212
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead565
Keywords chondrocalcinosis, CPPD, ultrasound, crystal arthritis, diagnostic accuracy
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/26539058
Publisher URL https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article/63/8/2205/7330416