Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Systematic reviews of animal studies – Report of an international symposium

Fausak, Erik; Funaro, Melissa C.; Kepsel, Andrea C.; Eldermire, Erin R.B.; Foster, Margaret; Norton, Hannah F.; Mears, Kim; Crews, Molly E.; Brennan, Marnie; Currie, Gillian L.; LaFollette, Megan R.; O’Connor, Annette; Smith, Adrian J.; Wever, Kimberley E.; Fricke, Suzanne

Systematic reviews of animal studies – Report of an international symposium Thumbnail


Authors

Erik Fausak

Melissa C. Funaro

Andrea C. Kepsel

Erin R.B. Eldermire

Margaret Foster

Hannah F. Norton

Kim Mears

Molly E. Crews

Gillian L. Currie

Megan R. LaFollette

Annette O’Connor

Adrian J. Smith

Kimberley E. Wever

Suzanne Fricke



Abstract

Objective: The Symposium on Animal Systematic Reviews held 24 May 2022, sought to bring organisations working on animal literature searching and systematic reviews together into the same virtual space for introductions and discussion.

Background: Groups working on animal research synthesis are often siloed into preclinical, veterinary, and One Health settings. This symposium sought to define commonalities and differences in methodologies, resources, and philosophies and to discuss future needs.

Methods: The 3-hour virtual symposium for veterinarians, researchers, and information specialists began with introductions by panelists from organisations involved in searching the literature for animal studies and conducting systematic reviews. This was followed by a panel discussion and question and answer period.

Results: Panelists identified a need to ensure planning and accurate description of primary animal studies as a precursor to quality systematic reviews. They acknowledged and discussed differences in evidence synthesis expectations and tools based on the type of review, the types of studies available on the topic, and the focus on preclinical, veterinary, or One Health topics.

Conclusion: The need to increase the speed and quality of evidence reviews, and to automate updates, requires investing in the development of both skilled teams and platforms. The symposium provided a chance to identify existing resources, define challenges, and note gaps unique to systematic reviews of animal studies.

Application: This symposium acts as a baseline for ongoing discussions centred on improving the culture and pipeline for evidence syntheses of animal studies that inform decision-making.

Citation

Fausak, E., Funaro, M. C., Kepsel, A. C., Eldermire, E. R., Foster, M., Norton, H. F., …Fricke, S. (2023). Systematic reviews of animal studies – Report of an international symposium. Veterinary Evidence, 8(3), Article 653. https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i3.653

Journal Article Type Review
Acceptance Date Aug 11, 2023
Online Publication Date Aug 11, 2023
Publication Date Aug 11, 2023
Deposit Date Sep 26, 2023
Publicly Available Date Sep 26, 2023
Journal Veterinary Evidence
Electronic ISSN 2396-9776
Publisher RCVS Knowledge
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 8
Issue 3
Article Number 653
DOI https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i3.653
Keywords Animal systematic review; evidence synthesis; evidence-based veterinary medicine; literature searching; EBVM
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/25375641

Files

653-Article Text-6028-5643-10-20230821 (248 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
Copyright (c) 2023 Erik Fausak, Melissa C. Funaro, Andrea C. Kepsel, Erin R.B. Eldermire, Margaret Foster, Hannah F. Norton, Kim Mears, Molly E. Crews, Marnie Brennan, Gillian L. Currie, Megan R. LaFollette, Annette O’Connor, Adrian J. Smith, Kimberley E. Wever & Suzanne Fricke.




You might also like



Downloadable Citations