Dr LI SHEAN TOH LISHEAN.TOH@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
A comparison of six osteoporosis risk assessment tools among postmenopausal women in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Shean Toh, Li; Lai, Pauline Siew Mei; Wu, David Bin-Chia; Bell, Brian G.; Dang, Cuu Phuong Linh; Low, Bee Yean; Wong, Kok Thong; Guglielmi, Giuseppe; Anderson, Claire
Authors
Pauline Siew Mei Lai
David Bin-Chia Wu
Dr BRIAN BELL BRIAN.BELL@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
RESEARCH FELLOW
Cuu Phuong Linh Dang
Bee Yean Low
Kok Thong Wong
Giuseppe Guglielmi
Professor CLAIRE ANDERSON CLAIRE.ANDERSON@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
PROFESSOR OF SOCIAL PHARMACY
Abstract
Objectives
To compare and assess the performance of 6 osteoporosis risk assessment tools for screening osteoporosis in Malaysian postmenopausal women.
Methods
Six osteoporosis risk assessments tools (the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation [SCORE], the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument, the Age Bulk One or Never Estrogen, the body weight, the Malaysian Osteoporosis Screening Tool, and the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians) were used to screen postmenopausal women who had not been previously diagnosed with osteoporosis/osteopenia. These women also underwent a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan to confirm the absence or presence of osteoporosis.
Results
A total of 164/224 participants were recruited (response rate, 73.2%), of which only 150/164 (91.5%) completed their DXA scan. Sixteen participants (10.7%) were found to have osteoporosis, whilst 65/150 (43.3%) were found to have osteopenia. Using precision-recall curves, the recall of the tools ranged from 0.50 to 1.00, whilst precision ranged from 0.04 to 0.14. The area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.027 to 0.161. The SCORE had the best balance between recall (1.00), precision (0.04–0.12), and AUC (0.072–0.161).
Conclusions
We found that the SCORE had the best balance between recall, precision, and AUC among the 6 screening tools that were compared among Malaysian postmenopausal women.
Citation
Shean Toh, L., Lai, P. S. M., Wu, D. B.-C., Bell, B. G., Dang, C. P. L., Low, B. Y., Wong, K. T., Guglielmi, G., & Anderson, C. (2019). A comparison of six osteoporosis risk assessment tools among postmenopausal women in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia, 5(3), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2019.09.001
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 3, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 11, 2019 |
Publication Date | Sep 11, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Oct 1, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 2, 2019 |
Journal | Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia |
Electronic ISSN | 2405-5255 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 5 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 87-93 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2019.09.001 |
Keywords | Osteoporosis; Screening; Osteoporosis self-assessment tool for asians; Risk assessment; Performance comparison |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2473771 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525519300159 |
Contract Date | Oct 2, 2019 |
Files
A comparison of 6 osteoporosis risk assessment tools among postmenopausal women in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
(530 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Evaluation of the Rational Drug Use (RDU) literacy among undergraduate students
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search