Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Techno-economic feasibility of fluid catalytic cracking unit integrated chemical looping combustion – A novel approach for CO2 capture

Güleç, Fatih; Okolie, Jude A.; Erdogan, Ahmet

Techno-economic feasibility of fluid catalytic cracking unit integrated chemical looping combustion – A novel approach for CO2 capture Thumbnail


Authors

DR FATIH GULEC FATIH.GULEC1@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Assistant Professor in Chemical and Environmental Engineering

Jude A. Okolie

Ahmet Erdogan



Abstract

Oil refineries are collectively responsible for about 4–6% of the global CO2 emissions, largely because of the regenerator part of the Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) unit (25–35%). An advanced combustion technology, also called chemical looping combustion (CLC), has been recently presented as a novel CO2 capture process for FCC units; however, no study provides the economic feasibility of a CLC-FCC unit. In this study, a techno-economic feasibility of the novel CLC-FCC unit was presented for the first time based on a case study with 50,000 barrels feed per day. A rigorous mass and energy balance estimation shows that 96 vol% of coke regeneration (combustion) was achieved in the FCC regenerator by using a stoichiometrically required amount of metal oxide (CuO modified catalysts) at 750 °C for 45 min. The preliminary energy penalty calculations of the proposed CLC-FCC unit (0.21 GJ/ton CO2) is relatively lower compared to the post-combustion (3.1–4.2 GJ/t CO2) via amine solvent and oxy-fuel combustion (1.8–2.5 GJ/t CO2) units reported in the literature. The equipment purchase cost (EPC) is 1.1 times higher than a standalone FCC unit due to the increase in the number of processing equipment required. The cash flow analysis results reveal a yearly basis average CO2 capture cost of 0.0106 US$/kg of CO2 (∼10.6 US$/ton CO2) for the CLC-FCC unit, which is lower compared to the other conventional CCS technologies i.e. oxy-fuel combustion and post-combustion. Factors such as EPC, capital expenditure (CAPEX), and discount rate significantly influenced the capture cost. In contrast, the CO2 capture cost is not influenced by a change in oxygen carrier and electricity cost.

Citation

Güleç, F., Okolie, J. A., & Erdogan, A. (2023). Techno-economic feasibility of fluid catalytic cracking unit integrated chemical looping combustion – A novel approach for CO2 capture. Energy, 284, Article 128663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128663

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 5, 2023
Online Publication Date Aug 8, 2023
Publication Date Dec 1, 2023
Deposit Date Oct 16, 2023
Publicly Available Date Oct 17, 2023
Journal Energy
Print ISSN 0360-5442
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 284
Article Number 128663
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128663
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/24413742
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223020571?via%3Dihub