Quantifying gendered participation in OpenStreetMap: responding to theories of female (under) representation in crowdsourced mapping

Gardner, Z.; Mooney, P.; De Sabbata, S.; Dowthwaite, L.

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an exploratory quantitative analysis of gendered contributions to the online mapping project OpenStreetMap (OSM), in which previous research has identified a strong male participation bias. On these grounds, theories of representation in volunteered geographic information (VGI) have argued that this kind of crowdsourced data fails to embody the geospatial interests of the wider community. The observed effects of the bias however, remain conspicuously absent from discourses of VGI and gender, which proceed with little sense of impact. This study addresses this void by analysing OSM contributions by gender and thus identifies differences in men’s and women’s mapping practices. An online survey uniquely captured the OSM IDs as well as the declared gender of 293 OSM users. Statistics relating to users’ editing and tagging behaviours openly accessible via the ‘how did you contribute to OSM’ wiki page were subsequently analysed. The results reveal that volumes of overall activity as well editing and tagging actions in OSM remain significantly dominated by men. They also indicate subtle but impactful differences in men’s and women’s preferences for modifying and creating data, as well as the tagging categories to which they contribute. Discourses of gender and ICT, gender relations in online VGI environments and competing motivational factors are implicated in these observations. As well as updating estimates of the gender participation bias in OSM, this paper aims to inform and stimulate subsequent discourses of gender and representation towards a new rationale for widening participation in VGI.

Citation

Gardner, Z., Mooney, P., De Sabbata, S., & Dowthwaite, L. (2020). Quantifying gendered participation in OpenStreetMap: responding to theories of female (under) representation in crowdsourced mapping. GeoJournal, 85(6), 1603-1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10035-z

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jun 7, 2019
• Online Publication Date: Jun 29, 2019
• Publication Date: 2020-12
• Deposit Date: Jul 15, 2019
• Publicly Available Date: Jul 15, 2019
• Journal: GeoJournal
• Print ISSN: 0343-2521
• Electronic ISSN: 1572-9893
• Publisher: Springer Verlag
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 85
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 1603-1620
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10035-z
• Keywords: Volunteered geographic information, Crowdsourced mapping: gendern biases, OpenStreetMap, Feminist GIS, Critical GIS
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/2307403
• Publisher URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10708-019-10035-z