Miriam Santer
RF04 Oral spironolactone for adult female acne (SAFA): a multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial
Santer, Miriam; Layton, Alison; Lau, Eva; Eminton, Zina; Stuart, Beth; Sach, Tracey; Pyne, Sarah; Ridd, Matthew; Francis, Nick; Soulsby, Irene; Thomas, Karen; Permyakova, Nathalie; Little, Paul; Muller, Ingrid; Nutall, Jacqui; Griffiths, Gareth; Thomas, Kim; Renz, Suzanne; Lawrence, Megan
Authors
Alison Layton
Eva Lau
Zina Eminton
Beth Stuart
Tracey Sach
Sarah Pyne
Matthew Ridd
Nick Francis
Irene Soulsby
Karen Thomas
Nathalie Permyakova
Paul Little
Ingrid Muller
Jacqui Nutall
Gareth Griffiths
Professor KIM THOMAS KIM.THOMAS@NOTTINGHAM.AC.UK
Professor of Applied Dermatology Research
Suzanne Renz
Megan Lawrence
Abstract
Acne is common and results in significant burden and patients with acne frequently receive prolonged oral antibiotics leading to antimicrobial resistance. Oral spironolactone is prescribed for acne, although there is a paucity of evidence on its effectiveness. The aim of this pragmatic parallel, double-blind, superiority trial was to assess the effectiveness of systemic spironolactone for acne in adult women. Participants were identified through primary and secondary health care and through community and social media advertising. Women aged ≥ 18 years with facial acne for at least 6 months, judged to warrant oral antibiotics, were invited to participate. Consented recruits were randomized 1 : 1 to either 50 mg daily spironolactone or matched placebo until week 6, increasing to 100 mg daily spironolactone or placebo until week 24. Topical treatment could be continued. The primary outcome was Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) symptom subscale score at week 12. Secondary outcomes included Acne-QoL at week 24, participant self-assessed improvement, Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) and adverse effects. Of 1267 women assessed, 410 were randomized (201 intervention, 209 control) and 342 were included in the primary analysis. Baseline mean (SD) age was 29.2 (7.2) years, 7.9% (n = 28/356) were of a non-White background, 46% had mild acne, 40% moderate acne and 13% severe acne (IGA classified). Eighty-three per cent used topical treatments. Over 95% of patients in both groups tolerated treatment and increased dosage. Mean (SD) Acne-QoL symptom scores at baseline and week 12 were 13.2 (4.9) and 19.2 (6.1) for spironolactone and 12.9 (4.5) and 17.8 (5.6) for placebo, respectively {difference favouring spironolactone 1.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07–2.46]}. Scores at week 24 were 21.2 (5.9) for spironolactone and 17.4 (5.8) for placebo [difference 3.45 (95% CI 2.16–4.75)]. Secondary outcomes also favoured spironolactone at week 12, with greater differences at week 24. More participants on spironolactone reported acne improvement than those on placebo. At week 12, this difference was not statistically significant [72.2% vs. 67.9%; odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% CI 0.70–1.91], but at week 24, it was significant (81.9% vs. 63.3%; OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.50–4.93). Treatment success (IGA classified) at week 12 was 31/201 on spironolactone and 9/209 on placebo (OR 5.18, 95% CI 2.18–12.28). Adverse reactions were not serious and were similar between groups, although more headaches were reported by those on spironolactone (20.4% vs. 12.0%; P = 0.02). Spironolactone improved outcomes vs. placebo, with greater differences at week 24 than at week 12. This study supports spironolactone as a potential alternative to oral antibiotics for acne in adult women.
Citation
Santer, M., Layton, A., Lau, E., Eminton, Z., Stuart, B., Sach, T., …Lawrence, M. (2023). RF04 Oral spironolactone for adult female acne (SAFA): a multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial. British Journal of Dermatology, 188(Supplement_4), Article ljad113.013. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad113.013
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 26, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 26, 2023 |
Publication Date | Jun 26, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Dec 12, 2023 |
Journal | British Journal of Dermatology |
Print ISSN | 0007-0963 |
Electronic ISSN | 1365-2133 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 188 |
Issue | Supplement_4 |
Article Number | ljad113.013 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad113.013 |
Keywords | Dermatology |
Public URL | https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/22989761 |
Publisher URL | https://academic.oup.com/bjd/article/188/Supplement_4/ljad113.013/7207123 |
You might also like
Validation of treatment escalation as a definition of atopic eczema flares
(2015)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Nottingham
Administrator e-mail: discovery-access-systems@nottingham.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search