Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cytosponge procedures produce fewer respiratory aerosols and droplets than oesophagogastroduodenoscopies

Gordon, George S.D.; Warburton, Samantha; Parkes, Sian; Kerridge, Abigail; Parra-Blanco, Adolfo; Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Jacobo; Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.

Cytosponge procedures produce fewer respiratory aerosols and droplets than oesophagogastroduodenoscopies Thumbnail


Authors

Samantha Warburton

Sian Parkes

Abigail Kerridge

Adolfo Parra-Blanco

Jacobo Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo

Rebecca C. Fitzgerald



Abstract

Esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) are aerosol-generating procedures that may spread respiratory pathogens. We aim to investigate the production of airborne aerosols and droplets during Cytosponge procedures, which are being evaluated in large-scale research studies and National Health Service (NHS)implementation pilots to reduce endoscopy backlogs. We measured 18 Cytosponge and 37 EGD procedures using a particle counter (diameters = 0.3–25 μm), taking measurements 10 cm from the mouth. Two particle count analyses were performed: whole procedure and event-based. Direct comparison with duration-standardized EGD procedures shows that Cytosponge procedures produce 2.16× reduction (P < 0.001) for aerosols and no significant change for droplets (P = 0.332). Event-based analysis shows that particle production is driven by throat spray (aerosols: 138.1× reference, droplets: 16.2×), which is optional, and removal of Cytosponge (aerosols: 14.6×, droplets: 62.6×). Cytosponge burping produces less aerosols than EGD (2.82×, P < 0.05). Cytosponge procedures produce significantly less aerosols and droplets than EGD procedures and thus reduce two potential transmission routes for respiratory viruses.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 14, 2023
Online Publication Date Oct 28, 2023
Publication Date 2024-03
Deposit Date Apr 5, 2024
Publicly Available Date Apr 9, 2024
Print ISSN 1120-8694
Electronic ISSN 1442-2050
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 37
Issue 3
Article Number doad061
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad061
Public URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/21646313
Publisher URL https://academic.oup.com/dote/article/37/3/doad061/7332012

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations