Consent and refusal of procedures during labour and birth: a survey among 11 418 women in the Netherlands

Van Der Pijl, Marit Sophia Gerardina; Klein Essink, Margot; Van Der Linden, Tineke; Verweij, Rachel; Kingma, Elselijn; Hollander, Martine H; De Jonge, Ank; Verhoeven, Corine J

Abstract

Background: Informed consent for medical interventions is ethically and legally required; an important aspect of quality and safety in healthcare; and essential to person-centred care. During labour and birth, respecting consent requirements, including respecting refusal, can contribute to a higher sense of choice and control for labouring women. This study examines (1) to what extent and for which procedures during labour and birth women report that consent requirements were not met and/or inadequate information was provided, (2) how frequently women consider consent requirements not being met upsetting and (3) which personal characteristics are associated with the latter. Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted in the Netherlands among women who gave birth up to 5 years previously. Respondents were recruited through social media with the help of influencers and organisations. The survey focused on 10 common procedures during labour and birth, investigating for each procedure if respondents were offered the procedure, if they consented or refused, if the information provision was sufficient and if they underwent unconsented procedures, whether they found this upsetting. Results: 13 359 women started the survey and 11 418 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Consent not asked was most often reported by respondents who underwent postpartum oxytocin (47.5%) and episiotomy (41.7%). Refusal was most often over-ruled when performing augmentation of labour (2.2%) and episiotomy (1.9%). Information provision was reported inadequate more often when consent requirements were not met compared with when they were met. Multiparous women had decreased odds of reporting unmet consent requirements compared with primiparous (adjusted ORs 0.54-0.85). There was considerable variation across procedures in how frequently not meeting consent requirements was considered upsetting. Conclusions: Consent for performing a procedure is frequently absent in Dutch maternity care. In some instances, procedures were performed in spite of the woman's refusal. More awareness is needed on meeting necessary consent requirements in order to achieve person-centred and high-quality care during labour and birth.

Citation

Van Der Pijl, M. S. G., Klein Essink, M., Van Der Linden, T., Verweij, R., Kingma, E., Hollander, M. H., De Jonge, A., & Verhoeven, C. J. (2024). Consent and refusal of procedures during labour and birth: a survey among 11 418 women in the Netherlands. BMJ Quality and Safety, 33(8), 511-522. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015538

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Apr 27, 2023
• Online Publication Date: May 22, 2023
• Publication Date: 2024-08
• Deposit Date: Jun 8, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Jun 8, 2023
• Journal: BMJ Quality and Safety
• Print ISSN: 2044-5415
• Electronic ISSN: 2044-5423
• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 33
• Issue: 8
• Article Number: 015538
• Pages: 511-522
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015538
• Keywords: healthcare quality improvement, obstetrics and gynecology, womens health, patient-centred care, shared decision making
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/21630626
• Publisher URL: https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/early/2023/05/18/bmjqs-2022-015538