Influence of setting-dependent contacts and protective behaviours on asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst members of a UK university

Fairbanks, Emma L; Bolton, Kirsty J.; Jia, Ru; Figueredo, Grazziela P.; Knight, Holly; Vedhara, Kavita

Abstract

We survey 62 users of a university asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing service on details of their activities, protective behaviours and contacts in the 7 days prior to receiving a positive or negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result in the period October 2020–March 2021. The resulting data set is novel in capturing very detailed social contact history linked to asymptomatic disease status during a period of significant restriction on social activities. We use this data to explore 3 questions: (i) Did participation in university activities enhance infection risk? (ii) How do contact definitions rank in their ability to explain test outcome during periods of social restrictions? (iii) Do patterns in the protective behaviours help explain discrepancies between the explanatory performance of different contact measures? We classify activities into settings and use Bayesian logistic regression to model test outcome, computing posterior model probabilities to compare the performance of models adopting different contact definitions. Associations between protective behaviours, participant characteristics and setting are explored at the level of individual activities using multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). We find that participation in air travel or non-university work activities was associated with a positive asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, in contrast to participation in research and teaching settings. Intriguingly, logistic regression models with binary measures of contact in a setting performed better than more traditional contact numbers or person contact hours (PCH). The MCA indicates that patterns of protective behaviours vary between setting, in a manner which may help explain the preference for any participation as a contact measure. We conclude that linked PCR testing and social contact data can in principle be used to test the utility of contact definitions, and the investigation of contact definitions in larger linked studies is warranted to ensure contact data can capture environmental and social factors influencing transmission risk.

Citation

Fairbanks, E. L., Bolton, K. J., Jia, R., Figueredo, G. P., Knight, H., & Vedhara, K. (2023). Influence of setting-dependent contacts and protective behaviours on asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst members of a UK university. Epidemics, 43, Article 100688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100688

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: May 12, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Jun 2, 2023
• Publication Date: Jun 1, 2023
• Deposit Date: May 17, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Jun 1, 2023
• Journal: Epidemics
• Print ISSN: 1755-4365
• Electronic ISSN: 1878-0067
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 43
• Article Number: 100688
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100688
• Keywords: Virology; Infectious Diseases; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Microbiology; Parasitology; Epidemiology
• Public URL: https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/20833722
• Publisher URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436523000245?via%3Dihub